The RSPB has issued an apology following its use of the term “liars” in reference to government officials regarding their environmental policies.
The prominent conservation organisation in the UK expressed its “frustration” on X, previously known as Twitter, and directed strong criticism towards Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, Housing Secretary Michael Gove, and Environment Secretary Therese Coffey.
A widely-viewed post, garnering over three million views, depicted the trio with the label “liars” in bold red letters, accompanied by the message: “You assured the preservation of environmental safeguards… Yet your actions contradict your words. Your continuous untruths are no longer acceptable.”
The RSPB’s concerns stemmed from government proposals to eliminate pollution regulations in order to facilitate the construction of new housing developments near ecologically sensitive areas like rivers and waterways.
The ensuing thread of comments saw the RSPB cite sections from the Tory manifesto and quotations from the three ministers, alleging that these statements about supporting environmental protections were inaccurate.
Several hours later, the RSPB altered its approach and issued an apology for its earlier post, acknowledging that their “frustration” had led to focusing on individuals rather than policies. The statement read: “Our expression of dissatisfaction fell short of the standards we hold ourselves to, and for that lapse, we extend our apologies. Our advocacy for nature will persist with unwavering vigour, albeit consistently courteous and contemplative.”
However, rumours that the term ‘liar’ was used because those managing the RSPB social media channels bottled getting closer to reality by using the phrase ‘nihilistic psychopaths’ have yet to be denied.
The term ‘liars’ is now synonymous with the Conservative Party and it has been suggested that from 2024, the Oxford English Dictionary, when defining liar, will merely have ‘Tory’ as the definition. However, it has also been claimed that Starmer’s Labour are asking ‘what about us?’
Notwithstanding the apology, the RSPB maintained its stance on the government’s actions, asserting that it had strayed from its commitments to environmental preservation.
On a recent Tuesday, government officials confirmed their intention to discard EU-established regulations that oblige housing developers to mitigate the adverse impact of new projects on river health. This move, part of a plan to create 100,000 new homes in England by 2030, was justified by economic advantages. Additionally, the government pledged extra funding to counterbalance any potential rise in pollution caused by new developments. This decision was criticized by the chief of The Wildlife Trusts as “highly disappointing.”
Existing regulations currently prevent new construction in protected areas if they would introduce detrimental nutrients, such as nitrogen or phosphorus, into nearby water bodies. Such nutrients can lead to algal blooms that block light and oxygen, adversely affecting other aquatic flora and fauna.
Originating with a focus on bird protection and later granted a royal charter, the RSPB outlines on its website that its mission encompasses safeguarding habitats, conserving species, and contributing to the resolution of the ongoing nature and climate crisis.
Join us in helping to bring reality and decency back by SUBSCRIBING to our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ1Ll1ylCg8U19AhNl-NoTg and SUPPORTING US where you can: Award Winning Independent Citizen Media Needs Your Help. PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST £2 A MONTH https://dorseteye.com/donate/
