Many pensioners have stated they do not need the Winter Fuel Allowance. The Tories have just made this case on behalf of Labour. They couldn’t face chatting to the plebs and the proles so they went for an affluent pensioner wearing a Rolex.
Tragic and hysterical in the same moment. They will never learn.
As one person pointed out on X:
‘What a poor tory this fellow is. Rolex watch, £1250 lamp-stand. But the poor fucker says he will freeze this winter due to losing the W.F.A. If you fall for this bullshit, YOU NEED HELP.’
This winter, pensioners will have to choose between heating and eating.
— Conservatives (@Conservatives) October 4, 2024
And that’s on Keir Starmer. pic.twitter.com/JMrqLyXtD8
Leaving Us Behind
A close examination of Conservative policies in recent decades reveals a pattern where the interests of the upper and upper-middle classes are prioritised, often at the expense of those in the lower echelons of society. The impact of these policies, from austerity measures to tax cuts, and the systematic weakening of public services, suggests a profound disregard for the working class, the unemployed, and those reliant on social welfare. While the Conservatives maintain that their policies are meant to create a dynamic economy that works for everyone, the reality is that the benefits are disproportionately enjoyed by the wealthy, leaving the majority of the population to contend with stagnant wages, rising living costs, and crumbling public services.
One of the most striking examples of this is the Conservative Party’s approach to taxation. Since coming to power in 2010, the party has implemented several tax policies that have overwhelmingly favoured the wealthy. For instance, the Conservatives have consistently lowered the top rate of income tax, benefiting high earners. Under Prime Minister David Cameron, the top rate of income tax was reduced from 50% to 45%, a move that primarily benefitted the wealthiest individuals in the country. At the same time, corporation tax has been steadily reduced, from 28% in 2010 to 19% by 2020, with further reductions considered in subsequent years. The argument behind these cuts is that by allowing companies and high earners to retain more of their income, they will invest more in the economy, creating jobs and stimulating growth. Yet, there is little evidence that these tax cuts have led to widespread economic benefits. Instead, they have widened the gap between the rich and the poor, with wealthier individuals and corporations accumulating vast amounts of wealth while wage growth for the average worker has stagnated.
The Conservatives’ commitment to reducing taxes for the wealthy has not been matched by a similar commitment to providing relief for those at the lower end of the income scale. In fact, many of the tax policies implemented by the party have placed a greater burden on the poor. One of the most regressive measures has been the increase in VAT from 17.5% to 20% in 2011. VAT is a consumption tax that disproportionately affects lower-income households, as they spend a larger portion of their income on goods and services subject to the tax. While income tax cuts for the wealthy may have provided them with more disposable income, the increase in VAT has had the opposite effect for those on lower incomes, exacerbating inequality and making it harder for ordinary families to make ends meet.
In addition to their tax policies, the Conservatives have overseen significant cuts to public services, which have disproportionately affected the poor and working class. Austerity measures, introduced in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, were ostensibly aimed at reducing the national deficit. However, the cuts that followed fell heavily on public services that are vital to those on lower incomes. The NHS, education, social care, and local government services have all faced significant reductions in funding, resulting in longer waiting times for healthcare, overcrowded classrooms, and cuts to social care for the elderly and disabled. These services are relied upon more heavily by poorer households, who cannot afford private alternatives. By slashing funding to these services, the Conservatives have effectively shifted the burden of austerity onto the most vulnerable in society, while wealthier individuals have been able to insulate themselves from the effects by turning to private healthcare, private education, and paid-for services.
The housing crisis provides another stark example of how Conservative policies have favoured the upper and upper-middle classes, while leaving the rest behind. The cost of housing in the UK has soared in recent years, particularly in London and the South East, making it increasingly difficult for young people and low-income families to afford a home. While the Conservatives have paid lip service to the idea of increasing housing supply, their policies have done little to address the root causes of the crisis. Instead, policies like Help to Buy have largely benefited wealthier individuals, by driving up house prices and allowing those with the means to access large mortgages to purchase homes. At the same time, the party has been reluctant to take meaningful action to regulate the private rental sector, leaving tenants to contend with rising rents, poor living conditions, and a lack of security. The government’s failure to build enough affordable housing has left many people trapped in substandard accommodation or unable to afford a home of their own. Meanwhile, property owners and landlords, who tend to be wealthier, have seen the value of their investments soar, further entrenching inequality.
Social welfare cuts have been another hallmark of Conservative governance, disproportionately affecting the poor. The introduction of Universal Credit, which consolidated several existing benefits into a single payment, was intended to simplify the welfare system and encourage people into work. However, the rollout of Universal Credit has been plagued with problems, including long delays in payments, inadequate levels of support, and the introduction of harsh sanctions for claimants who fail to meet stringent requirements. These issues have pushed many people into poverty, exacerbating existing inequalities. Research has shown that the poorest households have been hit hardest by the changes to the welfare system, with many people forced to rely on food banks and other forms of emergency assistance. At the same time, the Conservatives have cut benefits for disabled people and reduced support for those unable to work, further marginalising some of the most vulnerable members of society. The rhetoric surrounding these cuts has often been couched in terms of fairness and rewarding those who work hard, but in reality, they have left many people worse off, while wealthier individuals have been shielded from the impact of austerity.
Education policy under the Conservatives has also disproportionately favoured the upper-middle classes. While the party has introduced reforms aimed at raising educational standards, such as the expansion of academies and free schools, these measures have often benefitted more affluent areas, where schools are better funded and have access to greater resources. At the same time, cuts to education funding have hit schools in poorer areas the hardest, leading to larger class sizes, fewer teachers, and reduced access to extracurricular activities. The decision to raise tuition fees for university students to £9,000 per year in 2012, and later allowing them to rise further with inflation, has made higher education increasingly inaccessible for those from low-income backgrounds. While wealthier families can afford to support their children through university, those from poorer backgrounds are often deterred by the prospect of incurring significant debt, further entrenching social inequality.
The Conservatives’ approach to economic policy has also favoured the wealthy. Their focus on deregulation and so called free markets has benefitted corporations and high earners, while failing to address the needs of ordinary workers. The party’s reluctance to increase the minimum wage in line with inflation, coupled with the rise of zero-hour contracts and the gig economy, has left many workers struggling to make a living. Despite the government’s claim that they have overseen record levels of employment, much of this employment is precarious and poorly paid, with little job security. Meanwhile, the erosion of trade union power under successive Conservative governments has weakened workers’ ability to bargain for better pay and conditions, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation. The party’s ideological commitment to deregulation has also led to a weakening of workers’ rights, with the introduction of measures like the Trade Union Act 2016, which made it harder for workers to strike. These policies have disproportionately affected those in low-paid and insecure jobs, while wealthier individuals, who are more likely to be in stable, well-paid employment, have been largely unaffected.
The Conservatives’ handling of Brexit also highlights their prioritisation of the interests of the wealthy over the concerns of the wider population. The party has long been divided on the issue of the European Union, with a significant faction pushing for the UK’s withdrawal from the bloc. While many working-class voters supported Brexit in the hope that it would lead to a fairer distribution of wealth and resources, the reality has been quite different. The economic uncertainty caused by Brexit, coupled with the government’s chaotic handling of the negotiations, has led to job losses, rising inflation, and a fall in living standards for many people. Meanwhile, wealthier individuals and businesses, who are better able to weather economic shocks, have been largely insulated from the worst effects of Brexit. The Conservatives’ decision to prioritise a hard Brexit, which has led to the UK leaving the single market and customs union, has disproportionately affected industries like manufacturing and agriculture, which employ large numbers of working-class people. At the same time, financial services, which are dominated by wealthy individuals and corporations, have been largely protected by government efforts to secure preferential access to EU markets for the City of London.
Thus, while the Conservative Party has long argued that their policies are designed to create a dynamic economy that benefits everyone, the reality is that their policies have consistently favoured the upper and upper-middle classes, while leaving the rest of society behind. Tax cuts for the wealthy, austerity measures that have disproportionately affected the poor, and a failure to address the housing crisis and rising inequality have all contributed to a widening gap between rich and poor. The Conservatives’ focus on deregulation, free markets, and individual responsibility has left many people struggling to make ends meet, while wealthier individuals have seen their incomes and wealth rise. While the party may claim to be working in the interests of the nation as a whole, their policies suggest a different reality: one in which the interests of the rich are prioritised, while the rest are left to fend for themselves in an increasingly unequal society.
KEEP US ALIVE and join us in helping to bring reality and decency back by SUBSCRIBING to our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ1Ll1ylCg8U19AhNl-NoTg AND SUPPORTING US where you can: Award Winning Independent Citizen Media Needs Your Help. PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST £2 A MONTH https://dorseteye.com/donate/
