The recent rise of Bluesky as a popular alternative to Elon Musk’s rebranded social media platform, X (formerly Twitter), speaks volumes about the shifting digital landscape. As Bluesky’s membership soared from 9 million in September to 14.5 million by mid-November 2024, it’s clear that users are abandoning X in favour of what they view as a more open, less contentious online space. This exodus is largely attributed to Musk’s alignment with far-right ideologies and public endorsements, particularly his vocal support for President-elect Donald Trump following the recent U.S. election. Coupled with an increase in harmful content, misinformation, and limited functionality on X, many users feel compelled to find refuge on Bluesky, a platform originally designed by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey.
A Rapid Rise in Membership
Bluesky has seen exponential growth in recent months. On 12 November, the company announced that its user base had reached 14.5 million, a sharp increase from 9 million in September. The platform’s growth gained significant traction following Trump’s election victory on 5 November, with 700,000 new sign-ups in the week immediately following the results. This wave of new members stems primarily from the U.S. and the U.K., reflecting political and cultural concerns regarding Musk’s evolving stance on X. Bluesky’s spokesperson, Emily Liu, emphasised the diversity of new users, describing them as a mix of “Swifties, wrestlers, and city planners,” illustrating the broad demographic appeal that Bluesky offers as it presents itself as a neutral, welcoming space.
Elon Musk’s Influence and Right-Wing Shift
When Musk purchased Twitter for $44 billion in 2022, many anticipated that his involvement might shake up the platform. However, his changes have taken on a distinctly partisan slant, particularly since the rebranding to X, where a more overt alignment with right-wing ideologies has emerged. Musk’s active endorsement of Trump and his criticism of U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer amid social unrest underscore this shift. Musk labeled Starmer as “#twotierkier,” stoking a narrative of impending civil unrest in the U.K. Statements like these have alienated numerous users, pushing them to seek out alternatives where divisive political rhetoric is less prominent.
The connection between Musk and Trump appears mutually beneficial, as both figures thrive in media spectacles and share a penchant for polarising statements. This mutual support feeds a cycle of far-right discourse, amplifying sentiments that are often controversial or provocative. Public figures like New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have voiced relief in leaving X, with Ocasio-Cortez stating, “Good GOD it’s nice to be in a digital space with other real human beings,” after joining Bluesky. For these users, Bluesky represents not only a refuge from Musk’s political leanings but also a restoration of a more civil, genuine social media experience.
Growing Issues on X: Misinformation and Harmful Content
Another significant factor driving the migration from X is the deterioration in platform quality, specifically the rise in misinformation and harmful content. Since Musk’s takeover, users have reported an influx of offensive posts, with hate speech and conspiracy theories becoming more visible. Additionally, X users have expressed frustration with the platform’s functionality, especially concerning blocking and reporting tools, which seem less effective under Musk’s leadership. This shift in user experience has only been exacerbated by Musk’s relaxed moderation policies and a reduction in staff, both of which are widely viewed as enabling the proliferation of harmful content.
Furthermore, X’s rebranding effort itself has had a polarising effect, leading to a 20% drop in users after its transition from Twitter to X. Longtime users are dissatisfied not only with the platform’s ideological leanings but also with changes to its design and usability. In contrast, Bluesky has introduced features familiar to Twitter users, such as direct messaging, creating an environment that feels familiar yet distinct from X. Bluesky’s decentralised approach also appeals to users, as it allows for community-driven interactions without the heavy hand of a single corporation or figure controlling the narrative.
Public Figures and High-Profile Departures
Prominent public figures have increasingly voiced their discontent with X, both for its political associations and for its operational deficiencies. British comedian Greg Davies recently announced his departure from X, expressing gratitude for the memories shared on the platform and encouraging fans to connect with him elsewhere. This migration of well-known figures brings attention to the dissatisfaction with Musk’s platform, underscoring that it’s not just the general public who feel alienated. Other high-profile users, such as Home Office minister Jess Philips and Labour MP Lewis Atkinson, have also switched to Bluesky, particularly in light of Musk’s comments about U.K. politics, which they found to be divisive and inflammatory.
The exodus from X has been especially pronounced in countries where Musk’s positions on political matters are controversial. For instance, after X faced suspension in Brazil, Bluesky gained approximately three million new users. This rapid increase in international members showcases Bluesky’s appeal as a globally accessible, apolitical platform, furthering its reputation as a viable alternative to X.
Bluesky’s Origins and Appeal
Bluesky’s origin story adds an intriguing layer to its current appeal. Originally conceived in 2019 as a project within Twitter, Bluesky was intended to explore decentralised social networking concepts that would offer greater user control and interoperability between networks. This vision, spearheaded by then-Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, aimed to give users more agency in their online interactions. In 2021, Bluesky became an independent entity led by Jay Graber, transforming into a platform where different communities can coexist without a central, controlling corporate presence.
Bluesky’s decentralised model contrasts sharply with the corporate structure of X and offers users the opportunity to interact in communities without top-down impositions. This design is particularly appealing to those disillusioned by Musk’s interventionist approach on X, where ideological biases seem to influence platform operations. By reintroducing a sense of user autonomy, Bluesky provides a space that feels more open, less divisive, and distinctly less controlled by a singular corporate agenda.
Bluesky’s Position in the Market
Bluesky’s surge has positioned it prominently among social media platforms, ranking second only to Meta’s Threads on the U.S. Apple App Store. With 275 million active monthly users, Threads has a significant head start, but Bluesky’s recent growth trajectory demonstrates its potential to compete. Bluesky’s ability to capture the attention of millions in a short span speaks to the public’s desire for a social media platform that prioritises community, decentralisation, and ideological neutrality.
As more users and public figures opt for Bluesky, the platform’s appeal is only likely to grow. Its approachable, user-centered features, such as direct messaging and a familiar interface, make it a strong alternative for those leaving X. The increase in users also benefits Bluesky’s visibility and credibility, helping it to build an identity as the preferred social platform for those seeking meaningful connections in an online environment free from the influence of contentious ideologies.
The Broader Implications
The mass departure from X to Bluesky reflects more than just a reaction to Musk’s influence or political alignment. It is indicative of a larger shift in how people want to interact online, where users are actively seeking out spaces that feel welcoming, respectful, and open. This migration speaks to a desire for transparency, decentralisation, and an environment where users feel like they belong without fear of encountering inflammatory content or targeted misinformation.
Bluesky’s ascent also highlights a growing disillusionment with traditional social media platforms that prioritise profit and personal agendas over user experience and community. Platforms like Bluesky that champion decentralisation and user empowerment represent an evolving digital landscape, where control over content and personal agency take precedence over corporate influence. As Bluesky continues to grow, it may pave the way for a new era of social media, one that values integrity and inclusivity above all.
The mass migration from X to Bluesky illustrates the profound impact that leadership, political ideology, and platform design can have on user engagement. Musk’s alignment with far-right ideologies and his support for Trump have made X increasingly divisive, pushing users to seek out Bluesky as a haven for more balanced, authentic interactions. Bluesky’s decentralised model and commitment to community-driven engagement offer an appealing alternative to the centralised control that now defines X. As millions of users, including public figures, political voices, and everyday people, embrace Bluesky, it is clear that the demand for inclusive, open digital spaces is stronger than ever.
In the face of growing dissatisfaction with X, Bluesky has positioned itself as a powerful alternative, leading the charge toward a new era of social networking where control is returned to the people, and the user experience takes priority over corporate agendas. With continued growth and an expanding user base, Bluesky could very well become the future of social media, offering a platform that resonates with the values of freedom, respect, and community.
If you do please make sure you follow Dorset Eye
