Prime Minister,
What is it with politicians? You all appear to have the ingrown belief that the general public is so stupid that we can have the wool pulled over our eyes without any fear of us discovering that it’s being done to us. It is becoming very obvious that certain parties are doing their damnedest to obstruct the forthcoming enquiry into the sexual abuse of children by Parliamentarians and their close friends. There are those among you who have still – it seems – not grasped the idea that the amount of information available to the general public is now extraordinarily vast compared to what was available in the 1980s, and that the flow of that information is unstoppable. No longer do we live in a nation where a resident of London was completely unaware of what might be happening to one in Cardiff or anywhere else, or reliant entirely upon the government’s propaganda mouthpieces that are the mainstream media. Therefore, if Parliamentarians continue to attempt to cover up the foul goings-on that have ruined children’s lives and even caused them to terminate early, the public is simply going to declare a complete lack of faith in the Parliamentary process and wash our hands of you all. You rely upon US to place you into your over-subsidised seats in what is proving to be a den of utter iniquity, and you are therefore bound to provide us with the answers we seek, and the justice that we demand, because if you don’t we will stop providing you with that cushy lifestyle and you can go whistle.
Again, I have cause to mention the unsuitability of Elizabeth Butler Sloss to be the head of the enquiry that is being convened. She is utterly compromised by the fact that her own brother actively protected a paedophile within Parliament, by managing to prevent the late Geoffrey Dickens, MP, from naming that person under the terms of Parliamentary privilege. That her brother was the Attorney General at the time was unforgiveable and answers are required regarding his motive for protecting the person concerned. Add to that, that she was compelled to make an embarrassing public apology to the organisation “Fathers 4 Justice” in the Lords’ (Link #2) goes to show that she is not what you might call “on the button.” Former judge or not, she is not someone that the general public can have any faith in at all to do an unbiased job as head of this enormously important enquiry.
I find it immensely interesting that the original allegations, submitted by Dickens, were hushed up by the Conservative government of the day, and that the apparent attempts to fudge the forthcoming enquiry are also being made by a government made up of Conservatives in the key positions. You lot need to get your brains out of the 1920s and start realising that we live in a society where the children of the poor do not exist for the deviant pleasure of the rich. No longer can your kind abuse our children and expect to hush it all up by bunging the parents half a Sovereign. It’s not going to happen; we will hound all such offenders into prison, public humiliation or suicide and we will do it via the many means of information transfer available to us, from the internet, to the good old telephone and even – should it become necessary – snail mail.
Looking at Mark Sedwill’s abysmal performance in front of the HASC: Does he really expect us to believe that a man in his position would go to such a publicly broadcast session so very badly prepared? All kudos to the SC Chairman for not letting him wriggle off the hook by means of the diversionary statements that he hoped would suffice as answers to basic and direct questions, and sent him off like a naughty schoolboy to do his homework and hand it in by Friday. Your “no stone unturned” statement is starting to look remarkably like a LIE, Prime Minister, and it is being made to look that way by the subordinates you have chosen to make this enquiry deliver a satisfactory outcome. It does the same damage to the Home Secretary’s statement to the House in which she declared that there would be full transparency in this enquiry. It looks to me as if your servants are deciding all by themselves that this particularly dirty dust has to be swept under the carpet at the insistence of very worried people who aren’t even living in your house.
Let’s look at where child abuse has traditionally occurred, Prime Minister. It happens in places where there is poverty or other social disadvantage. I therefore question the motives of the Conservative counsellor in Link #4 above, Michael Hytche, when he laments the lack of institutions for the mentally ill. How odd, when it was your own Conservative predecessors, in Margaret Thatcher’s government, who first introduced Care In The Community in 1983 and cleared out the institutions, and it was your own former Minister for Disabled People, Maria Miller MP, who shut down what amounted to the nearest thing to the workhouse for disabled people, Remploy, during the term of this government. So why does the Conservative councillor want to see a return to institutionalisation of the mentally ill? In view of the fact that the children abused by those in Parliament and their twisted cronies were sourced from institutions – care homes in their case – does this Conservative councillor perhaps feel that a care home full of mentally disabled children might provide a new source for the sexual deviants lurking in the shadows of Westminster – one whose victims were perhaps incapable of speaking out in complaint and being believed?
Social disadvantage and poverty provides the monsters who prey upon children with their sources of supply. That has been proved by the numerous care home scandals. So, Prime Minister, is this perhaps why your government has done nothing to address the problem of an additional 300,000+ children thrown into poverty by your own Ministers’ policies of attrition against those who were already poorly provided for? Is it the role of Social Services, under your government, to take children away from families who have been rendered unable to feed them by the DWP, in order to stock up the “live body bank” for the Establishment paedos to get stuck into – is that what it has all been about? Is the DWP now a haunt for pimps to the children-for-sex supply business? You and those who have carried out your policies regarding the withdrawal of social support had best start running now if that has been the reason, because we WILL see justice done in full to ANYONE who has had a hand in the supply chain for this filthy misbehaviour.
So, Prime Minister, you need to give serious consideration to stopping the practice of protecting royals who were associated with the worst serial child rapist yet uncovered, and leave the Buckingham Palace damage limitation to the people in that building. We want answers from our elected government regarding the sexual misbehaviour by certain people among your colleagues, and we are NOT going to let go of this issue until we get them.
Sincerely,
Darren Lynch
https://politicalscrapbook.net/2014/07/abuse-inquiry-judge-in-quit-call-her-brother-protected-paedophile
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cl7myfhwMMc&feature=youtu.be
https://politicalscrapbook.net/2014/07/top-home-office-official-sinks-like-a-stone-on-child-abuse-probe
https://politicalscrapbook.net/2014/07/tory-councillor-laments-demise-of-workhouses-for-mentally-ill/
