14 C
Dorset
Sunday, November 24, 2024

BBC clip of Prince Andrew and Jimmy Savile that ages worse than milk

Author

Categories

Share

First, Prince Andrew

Prince Andrew, a member of the British royal family, has been implicated in allegations of sexual abuse and misconduct. Virginia Giuffre, formerly known as Virginia Roberts, accused Prince Andrew of sexually abusing her when she was a minor. She claims that she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender, and was forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew on multiple occasions.

Prince Andrew has denied these allegations and maintains that he has no recollection of ever meeting Virginia Giuffre. However, his association with Epstein has raised significant concerns and led to his withdrawal from public duties in November 2019.

It’s important to note that these allegations have not been proven in a court of law, and Prince Andrew is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The legal proceedings and investigations regarding these allegations are ongoing, and it is up to the legal system to determine the truth and establish any criminal liability.

However, the courtroom was avoided thanks to mummy

Then, Jimmy Savile

In the annals of British television history, few figures have held a position as revered and influential as Sir Jimmy Savile. For decades, Savile entertained millions with his charismatic persona and tireless charity work. However, the shocking revelations that emerged in the aftermath of his death exposed a horrifying truth—a trail of sexual abuse and predatory behavior spanning several decades. This essay delves into the disturbing legacy of Jimmy Savile’s abuse, shedding light on the magnitude of his crimes and the lessons learned from this harrowing chapter in British history.

Background: The Icon Emerges

Born in 1926, Jimmy Savile initially gained fame as a radio and television presenter in the 1960s. He captivated audiences with his distinctive style, flamboyant personality, and eccentric attire, which included his signature tracksuits and massive gold chains. Savile’s eccentricity, combined with his tireless work for charitable causes, earned him knighthood in 1990 and cemented his place as a national treasure.

The Unmasking of a Predator

The revelation of Savile’s abuse came only after his death in 2011, leaving the British public stunned and disillusioned. The scale and scope of his crimes were shocking, with victims ranging from children to vulnerable adults. Numerous victims, many of whom had been silenced for decades, courageously stepped forward to share their harrowing experiences.

Savile’s abuse was not confined to a single location or institution. His predatory behavior infiltrated hospitals, children’s homes, and even the premises of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). Disturbingly, it was within the BBC, where Savile was an omnipresent figure for many years, that the abuse had thrived in plain sight. The subsequent investigation revealed a culture of silence, negligence, and complicity that allowed Savile’s crimes to persist unchecked.

Lessons Learned: The Price of Negligence

The Jimmy Savile scandal was a wake-up call for British society, exposing systemic failures that enabled an abuser to operate with impunity. It highlighted the devastating consequences of turning a blind eye to abuse, particularly when the perpetrator is protected by their public persona.

The initial reaction to the revelations was one of disbelief and denial, as the British public struggled to reconcile the image of their beloved icon with the monstrous reality. This experience underscored the importance of believing survivors and encouraging them to come forward, even when the accused is a well-known figure.

The aftermath of the scandal prompted significant changes in how abuse allegations are handled. It led to the establishment of several inquiries, including the Dame Janet Smith Review, which examined the culture and practices at the BBC during Savile’s tenure. The resulting report highlighted failures in management, complaints handling, and safeguarding procedures, leading to a significant overhaul of the BBC’s policies and a commitment to greater transparency and accountability.

Furthermore, the Savile scandal prompted wider societal reflections on power dynamics, accountability, and the protection of vulnerable individuals. It exposed the dangers of hero worship and the need for thorough vetting and oversight in institutions that interact with the most vulnerable members of society. The lessons learned from this dark chapter in British history continue to shape policies and practices aimed at preventing abuse and ensuring justice for survivors.

The revelations of Jimmy Savile’s abuse shattered the façade of a beloved British icon, exposing a disturbing reality that had remained hidden for decades. The courage of survivors who came forward paved the way for accountability and instigated vital changes in the way society deals with abuse allegations. While the legacy of Jimmy Savile’s abuse will forever be a stain on British television history, it serves as a stark reminder of the need for vigilance, transparency, and a commitment to safeguarding the most vulnerable among us. Only by learning from these painful lessons can we hope to build a safer and more just society for all.

What the BBC knew

The BBC’s involvement with Jimmy Savile and the knowledge they had about his abuse has been a subject of controversy and investigation. Jimmy Savile was a well-known British television and radio presenter who worked for the BBC for many years.

In 2012, after Savile’s death, multiple allegations of sexual abuse against him emerged, with victims coming forward to share their experiences. These revelations led to a public scandal and a widespread investigation into the extent of Savile’s abuse and who may have known about it.

Several investigations were conducted, including one by the BBC itself. The resulting reports revealed that there were instances where the BBC had been aware of rumors and allegations surrounding Savile’s behaviour during his time at the corporation, but action was not taken to address the issue effectively.

The BBC’s own investigation, conducted by former High Court judge Dame Janet Smith, concluded in 2016. The report, known as the “Smith Review,” found that there had been a culture of ignorance within the BBC, and there were missed opportunities to investigate and expose Savile’s abuse. It concluded that some BBC staff were aware of Savile’s behaviour and that there was a failure to properly respond to the allegations.

Many knew and some spoke out but nothing was done

The report also highlighted a number of factors that contributed to the lack of action, including the celebrity status of Savile, the culture of the time, and a perception of the BBC as an institution that was too powerful to challenge. It made several recommendations to prevent similar incidents in the future, including the establishment of stronger child protection policies and procedures.

It is important to note that the BBC is a large organisation, and the knowledge and actions of individuals within the corporation may have varied. The investigations sought to determine the overall institutional response and culture rather than placing blame on specific individuals.

And now this clip which has aged like milk:

We know that Savile’s crimes were hushed up when he was alive because of WHO would have been brought down with him. Many powerful figures are implicated and the establishment is breaking its back trying to keep a lid on Pandora’s jar.

Keep asking the questions and watch these criminals sweat and pray they die before being outed..

Jason Cridland

Join us in helping to bring reality and decency back by SUBSCRIBING to our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ1Ll1ylCg8U19AhNl-NoTg and SUPPORTING US where you can: Award Winning Independent Citizen Media Needs Your Help. PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST £2 A MONTH https://dorseteye.com/donate/

To report this post you need to login first.

Author

Share