2.3 C
Dorset
Sunday, February 9, 2025
HomeDorset NorthAll for one or none for all?

All for one or none for all?

Dear Sarah (Sarah Jackson is one of the right-hand staff for the Chief Constable of Hants Police).

There is a problem, and it’s potentially a big one.  Please would you take time to watch the video in the link?  It’s a journalist’s capture of a social campaigner trying to press a charge against Iain Duncan Smith for deliberate breach of several sections of the Human Rights Act and being fobbed off by an Inspector at Bath Police Station.

You can find a copy of the video at:  https://www.facebook.com/Grumblywuth/posts/1389571201184308 , which is part of my Facebook timeline.  I’ve preceded it with a comment which seems logical to me and I outline the problem in that comment, as follows:

Sonia, Keith:this Inspector has set a fearful precedent in what he has said to you in denying that he can arrest IDS for being in breach of the Human Rights Act. the key word is the last one – “ACT.”

He has now made it impossible for any police officer to arrest, for example, any individual who is found to be in breach of the Child Protection Act or any other law that is on our Statute Book whose title includes that three-letter word.

This has now become a very serious matter, which will need to be referred to the Law Lords at the earliest opportunity because, as from the time that this Inspector made his response to you, there has existed no enforceable law in the United Kingdom.

Friends: Please watch the video to see what I mean here. This is the second time that I’ve come across a situation where the police’s over-willingness to pass something off as “a civil matter” has actually undermined the rule of law in this country. The first time was, if you remember it, the case of a Polish national keeping fellow migrants in servitude. The Pole was jailed for six years, while the same issue, as applied by the DWP via workfare placements which are enriching private companies, was deemed by the police here in Hampshire to be merely “a civil matter.”

The police, it seems want to interpret the law both ways, and that is not possible. Either a law stands and must be obeyed by all, or the law must be deemed void. As all laws that are entered into Statute are based upon Acts (of Parliament), that means that what must apply to one Act must apply to all.

We therefore currently live in a nation that has no rule of law, except – possibly – bye-laws.”

I have urged Sonia, in her capacity as a freelance journalist, to take this particular matter to the House of Lords for comment and – hopefully – in-depth examination by the Law Lords because the situation must be clarified once and for all. The alternative: permitting the situation to continue will place your colleagues on the beat in an impossible situation unless it is resolved.  The simple fact is that, as at the time that Inspector made his response to Keith, all power for any constable to legally arrest any criminal engaged in, or known to have committed, a crime, was NULLIFIED.  Your officers currently have no more powers of arrest than a private security guard.

This is one aspect of policing of which I have been critical for many years now.  Many people have commented on various posts in the social media that it is our Ordinary-Joe taxes which pay for the police, but the police appear more concerned with defending and protecting those who consider themselves above the law, such as politicians and corporate bosses, including bank chiefs.  When the application of the law by the police is so blatantly unfair, is it any wonder that there are riots?  Many think not.

Iain Duncan Smith and Esther McVey, MPs, are clearly in breach of the Human Rights Act of 1998.  There is no way that IDS and McVey’s “Claimant Commitment Contract” can possibly supercede or replace a Statute law and people – especially vulnerable people – are not tokens on some political Monopoly board to be shoved around at the whim of a senior Minister who is widely suspected of being a clinical psychopath.  These two politicians have therefore BROKEN THE LAW and the police in Wiltshire have publicly – on camera! – refused to do anything about it.

The results of Smith and McVey’s criminality can be found in your own Service’s incident number 0538 of yesterday’s date.  It can also be found at https://www.facebook.com/Grumblywuth/posts/1389227527885342 .  A young mother, pushed to the very brink by a sanction imposed by the DWP, told the claimant adviser that she would take her own life rather than starve to death through having no means of support.  She was told by that adviser “That’s your choice.”  Luckily, thanks to the efforts of several of her friends on FB, she was found safe and well, albeit so severely depressed that she has been hospitalised and is – in her own words – on a cocktail of drugs to keep her stable.  Who introduced sanctions, in direct breach of the HRA 1998?  Iain Duncan Smith!  He has been advised innumerable times, in the House, in the press AND by means of emails and letters sent by myself and several others, including Keith (see video) that these suicides are directly linked to his policies, yet he has continued to apply these policies anyway.  That is a breach of the Suicide Act of 1961 because he can only be deemed to now be PROCURING those suicides by continuing the application of his policies.  Procurement of a suicide carries a mandatory prison sentence of up to fourteen years.  One could argue that the benefits centre adviser mentioned in the linked post above could also be guilty of attempting the same crime.

Atos, also mentioned by the Inspector in the video, have – without any shadow of a doubt – breached the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act of 1981, a charge that stands well proven by the massive increase in the number of appeals that have been lodged against their findings and which increased the cost of appeals to be borne by taxpayers by a staggering SIXTY-SIX per cent.  Their reports – which constitute medical records by strict definition – can only be deemed to have been false instruments, as defined under the terms of the F&C Act.  No police action has been taken to redress the thousands of criminal breaches, which were defined as such by two TV documentaries released on BBC2 and Channel 4 within weeks of each other, in which employees and former employees of Atos told of how they were pressured into falsifying their assessment reports in order to meet internal targets imposed by the Atos bosses.

Any document which has, as its base, an assessment of the fitness of an individual to perform or not perform any physical or mental deed must, by definition, be a medical record because that report must take into account any medical aid or philtre that enables the deed to be performed by the individual being assessed, or, conversely, prevents that individual from performing that deed.  An individual who was required to take morphine, for ecxample, could not be employed as a lorry driver.  The DWP and Atos have constantly denied that the reports are medical records and they are, therefore, lying.  There has been no action by the police to stop these breaches of a clearly written law.

Is it any wonder that there is now a move afoot to generate a taxation protest, in which people will write to HMRC demanding that the portion of their taxes that go to pay the police be refunded or not taken in the first place?  Have your budgets not been hacked thin enough yet by this government?

What about G4S, who are being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office for fraud following the overcharging for tagging of criminals scandal that broke last year?  At that time G4S was banned from taking on any new contracts issued by the government.  Suddenly, though, they are given a new one out of the blue, and isn’t it interesting that the husband of the present Home Secretary just happens to be a pretty hefty shareholder of G4S?

Come on, Police people!  We’re not stupid out here!

Please feel free to share this message with your colleagues in Wiltshire Constabulary if you feel it is necessary.

Thanks and regards,

Darren Lynch

To report this post you need to login first.
Dorset Eye
Dorset Eye
Dorset Eye is an independent not for profit news website built to empower all people to have a voice. To be sustainable Dorset Eye needs your support. Please help us to deliver independent citizen news... by clicking the link below and contributing. Your support means everything for the future of Dorset Eye. Thank you.

DONATE

Dorset Eye Logo

DONATE

- Advertisment -

Most Popular