Prime Minister,
It might have taken 30 years, but those police who collaborated with senior political figures to cover up the sexual abuse of young people, committed by members of the Establishment, are now starting to fear for their liberty and pensions. I note from the press yesterday that the most senior member of the London Metropolitan Police Service is to be investigated, being accused of covering up the sexual abuse of children when he was in charge at Merseyside. I’m just waiting for the news to tell us that he’s resigned in order to protect his pension, knighthood and golden handshake. That the police are to investigate themselves under the supervision of the IPCC does not inspire me greatly with any confidence that there will not be a whitewash of this matter.
It might have taken more years than it should, but those police responsible for the unnecessary deaths in the Hillsborough Disaster are now facing long overdue justice and are having to account for their actions, or the lack of actions that could have saved lives.
The investigations and the concurrent Enquiry into child sexual abuse are operations that whoever takes No10 on 7 May is going to have to accelerate, because this whole issue is rapidly turning into an international embarrassment for Britain. Our public schools are beginning to be seen as dens of iniquity where the First Year intake are buggered behind the bicycle sheds by Seniors as a matter of routine, and that the kind of creature produced at the end of the whole process is one who will willingly do it to others not in that system. Human nature causes people to tar all members of any defined grouping with the same brush, so the question is now arising as to who in Europe, the USA and even the BRICS bloc will want to sit down at a table with any member of a current British Establishment that has very visibly dragged its feet over this disgusting issue, and whose Home Secretary has even actively delayed the Parliamentary enquiry into it by nominating people who were patently unqualified by their personal associations with suspected offenders? In at least some of their minds, the question will have formed: “Am I going to be associating myself with someone who is potentially hiding a secret and illegal vice and hoping s/he isn’t going to be caught?” Not only is the concept of common justice on the line over this matter now, but political figures around the world will be wondering if, by associating themselves with British MP’s and other figures in authority here, they might end up having to defend their own personal reputations as well. “Paedophile” is not a tag that any self-respecting and otherwise respected individual is ever going to want to have to try and shake off, because people’s automatic view is that there’s never any smoke without fire. So, unless this filthy history is exposed fully and resolved with arrests and prosecutions from among those in the nation’s highest ivory towers who are known to be guilty, very soon, Britain’s position on the world’s stage will be weakened even further than it has been so far. You swore to leave no stone unturned in getting the guilty into the open, Prime Minister – grab your pick-axe and get digging.
What I can also say is that this government’s wanton dealing of death to vulnerable members of the British population, through sanctions and impossible-to-meet targets regarding the finding of reasonably paid employment, will absolutely NOT take another 30 years to bring to a resolution. Laws have been broken and the police have failed to act to bring those in Westminster to book for those breaches. The Suicide Act of 1961 is an example of these laws. The laws regarding the keeping of any individual in servitude is another, which has been broken by the application of sanctions against job-seekers.
There WILL be justice for those whose untimely deaths have been caused so unnecessarily, Prime Minister, and those police who have colluded with Ministers to prevent their prosecution WILL face justice. We will not allow the situation to go unresolved until the guilty have conveniently died or claim to have been struck by Alzheimers Disease. It might take months; it might take a few years; but justice WILL happen. We of the disabled community will set up our own version of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, and we will collect evidence of the crimes that have been committed against us and record the names of those who could have acted to uphold the law and prevent the deaths of our fellows in the disabled community, and we WILL seek the maximum possible punishment for the crimes against humanity that have been committed by this government and its agents and agencies. The precedent for punishing genetic cleansing was set at The Hague following the prosecution of Saddam Hussein, you might recall. “I was only following orders” will not, as it was not at Nuremburg, be a credible or permissible defence. Anyone granted a position of authority by the public’s consent is deemed to know the difference between right and wrong, and if they are found not to know that difference, they must be declared incompetent to fulfil the role they were granted and removed from it immediately, being prosecuted for the wrongs they have committed according to the severity of those wrongs.
- No British government has ever had, or will ever be given, the mandate to kill its own country’s people when they are not guilty of any crime against the nation.
- No court of law in this land has ever had the right to punish any individual or any class by denying him/her the means to feed him/her self, yet the Job Centre metes out this punishment to its clients on a daily basis for actions which are not even criminal.
- No member of this or any other government has ever been, or will ever be, above the law of the land.
- No police officer has ever had the right to ignore the laws that are currently on the Statute Book.
- No surviving disabled person will either forgive or forget the wilful ignorance of the three foregoing facts, or the actions of the Job Centre’s personnel under the umbrella of that wilful ignorance.
One of the questions for a graduating police officer at the Hendon Police Training College was, once: “You are at a party and you see your best friend roll and begin smoking a joint. Do you:
A. Ask him to put it out and flush it and the remainder of the substance down the toilet?
B. Take a toke yourself to determine what the substance is?
C. Leave the party and say no more about it?
D. Arrest him and report him for the illegal possession of a suspected Class B substance?
The correct answer was “D” regardless of the fact that the offender was the officer’s hypothetical best friend. The law is there to be upheld. The way the police have avoided and evaded upholding it, in the cases of child sexual abuse and the wilful procurement of suicides by the Department for Work and Pensions, makes a complete mockery of the standards to which all police, regardless of rank or position, are expected to conform. It is being seen, over and over again (Dolphin Square, Hillsborough, Rotherham, Merseyside, Scarborough, Savile), that this country’s taxpayers have not been, and are still not, receiving the standard of service from the police that we are rightfully due and are compelled to pay for. Why should we, therefore, continue to fund any police service? We might as well withhold the appropriate portion of our taxes and make the city mafias responsible for enforcement and the application of justice in the United Kingdom, because it is highly likely – based upon current evidence – that they would do a far better and more thorough job of it, probably in ways which would prevent any recidivism and avoid overcrowding our already full prisons.
If certain members of this country’s Establishment are not required to answer to the laws of the land then they also, by extension, are not entitled to the protection afforded by those same laws. If they cannot be prevented by the law from committing criminal misbehaviour against others, then their removal by other means cannot, logically, be a crime in itself because they are not entitled to protection from that same law. Do we need to re-arm ourselves, Prime Minister, and do the job that the police are continually failing to do on our behalf?
Perhaps if the London Metropolitan Police Service was to spend less time watching over just one socially harmless man who tells the truth, and spent more of that time investigating those who don’t and thereby cause enormous social harm, we might have a more civilised, safe and respectable society and law-abiding governing Establishment. That’s worth a thought or two, methinks…
Sincerely,
Darren Lynch
