Prime Minister,
A story has broken that Vladimir Putin is considering releasing video footage proving the 9/11 was an inside job conducted by America’s security services in order to goad the American public into a desire for the so-called War On Terror. If this is true, it will tie in with a number of mistakes made in the presentation of the post-strike media coverage. Such minor details as a news reporter lamenting the complete destruction of an entire building when the thing was plainly standing intact behind her, or a hole in the CIA building that no plane could possibly have fitted into, and which had to have been caused by a missile, not a passenger-carrying aircraft.
The second link, above is also interesting. Again, it might be propaganda sponsored by a seriously pissed-off Vladimir Putin, but I can’t personally see any independent news service putting words into the mouths of the Turkish leadership if such could result in highly expensive and very public litigation, can you? Such revelations could seriously hamper or even put a stop to Turkey’s plans for EU membership, could they not?
So, the question I have for you today, Prime Minister, is this: You were all agog to send our troops into Syria in the wake of the supposed use of chemical weapons by that country’s government after Murdoch’s alleged newspapers screamed their headlines. You created quite a stink about it, as I recall, and some very naughty words were said by one of your shorter Ministers in a fit of rage in the House of Commons, when the proposal was voted down. What did you know of the Turkish involvement? Why did Israel offer certain oil rights to Rupert Murdoch and another member of the US-based Council for Foreign Relations once they’d achieved the land-grab that they intended to carry out under the umbrella of the invasion?
How is it that all of the members of the non-democratic CFR are also either attendees, or at the least represented at, every equally non-democratic Bilderberg meeting? I notice from the guest list that has been published that, yet again, the USA has the most delegates attending. Is this how they ensure that other nation attendees toe the line – by having a bigger gang than anyone else?
Why is Obama on record as saying that we must prepare for a new world order, and stating that ordinary people are “too small-minded” to govern ourselves? Just who the hell does he think he is? The problem with every American president, of course, is that he is funded into office by those same CFR/Bilderbergers and once he’s in he has to parrot their policy. Is this why Oddspawn and Balls have the same views on the destruction of the welfare state? I note that they’re both in Denmark at the moment and on the Bilderberg guest list…
How is it that the USA, a nation with a $14 TRILLION international debt, can afford to fund wars in foreign countries? By the same token, how is that the the United Kingdom, with its own supposedly insurmountable (and increasing under your government) debt following the banking crash, can also afford to waste £30 billion on the Afghanistan invasion and occupation?
Ukraine is now showing all the signs of a false flag operation by NATO (read “the USA”), yet your Foreign Secretary has been almost bouncing up and down at the opportunity to send the RAF in, hasn’t he? What written authority has the American-owned United Nations provided to permit the use of its livery upon helicopter gunships that are being used to attack people in Ukraine, when memory says that the UN was adamantly opposed to use of that practice during the Balkans conflict? If such permission exists, can a copy be provided for authentication by the UN? Why is Hague so anxious to provide armed support to NATO, an organisation that is headed and driven by a proven corrupt administration, yet he’s too afraid to let a man dedicated to exposing the truth free to walk among his fellow human beings? Is it only multi-millionaire liars who can become trusted Tory friends?
Nigeria: Lee Rigby was hacked to death in the street in broad daylight by two individuals who, it later emerged, had been employed by the UK intelligence services. They have been jailed and – I believe (although I may be wrong) – deported, but your Home Secretary refuses to confirm whether they have been/will be imprison(ed) in their home country and, if so, in which named detention centre, or for how long. Coincidentally “Boko Haram” have supposedly kidnapped 200 schoolgirls, all at once, in Nigeria and, again, Hague has been practically champing at the bit to get our forces involved there. Does Boko Haram even exist, Prime Minister, or, like Al Quaeda, is it merely a bogeyman dreamed up by the out-of-control political class and their intelligence service lackeys in order to keep people’s opinion fractured, and distract us from the very real problems that we face within our own borders?
The EU: You have been accused of using outright blackmail in order to try and deny one of the EU’s top jobs to an experienced politician. In doing this you have exposed yourself as wanting us out of Europe altogether, referendum or no. We’ve already seen how you’ve manoeuvred to place Germany in the “bad guy” role in time for the referendum that you say you will give us on our European membership, so you can point to them as a reason why we should leave. Why? What is it about Jean-Claude Juncker that scares you, Prime Minister? Could it be that he’s seen through your thin veneer of wannabe statesman and recognised the self-centred, money-grubbing nationalist thug beneath? Merkel’s right-hand man certainly has, hasn’t he? It seems incredibly strange to me that you would be so opposed to one man who, if given the job, would actually delegate much of the work overseen by his office and who would, as is normal practice, be content to have much of the policy signed “By Direction.” So, why the opposition? Did he pinch your Thomas The Tank Engine at nursery school or something?
And, finally, why did the BBC, which is overseen by your Tory chum Patten (soon to be replaced by your Tory chum Coe) give so much publicity to the home of disaffected Tories, nazis and fascists – UKIP? Why is this country being deliberately steered down a path of nationalism and fascism, Prime Minister, aided and abetted by your Chancellor’s snidey remarks early on in your Parliamentary term about the disabled and unemployed sleeping off a life on benefits, and underlined by your Home Secretary’s outright use of racist methodology in her attempts to slow down the rate of (im)migration? Were the lessons from the inhumanity of the 1930s and 40s in mainland Europe not taught to you in that charity school that you went to? Or were you simply too thick to learn them?
Some serious, properly considered and, above all, TRUTHFUL answers would be appreciated to these questions by very many people, Prime Minister. You could probably start with the one that says: “Well, actually, we in the UK government also dance to the tune of the hidden money-men who use Bilderberg to explain quietly and succinctly to future national leaderships what will happen to them if they fail to meet our requirements. Remember JFK and all that…”
Also, has a date been set yet for the assassination of the Russian President? I might want to rent a TV so I can watch it live, and see how many CIA, Mossad and SIS operatives I can spot before the final edit is done for the cover-up.
Sincerely,
Darren Lynch
