Following the revelation that Lord Peter Madelson, also known as ‘the Prince of Darkness’, is to be made Ambassador to the USA by Keir Starmer, it is important to reflect and understand why. Official sources may well point to Mandelson’s skill set in dealing with the likes of Trump and Musk, while others suggest that Mandelson and Trump’s close links to serial child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Keir Starmer’s membership of a dodgy globalist group in which Epstein was also a member are the real reasons. Given the notorious links, the following will focus squarely on the latter.
Keir Starmer and The Trilateral Commission
The following sets the scene for understanding the roles of Starmer and Epstein in globalist politics.
When transitioning to Mandelson and Trump, let’s begin here:
The intricate web of associations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender, has ensnared numerous high-profile individuals across the globe. Among them are Lord Peter Mandelson, a prominent British Labour politician, and Donald Trump, the 45th and now 47th President of the United States. In the following, I delve into the nature and extent of their respective connections to Epstein, exploring the implications and controversies that have emerged as a result.
Peter Mandelson’s Association with Jeffrey Epstein
Lord Peter Mandelson, often referred to as the “Prince of Darkness” for his political acumen and behind-the-scenes influence, has had a distinguished career within the British Labour Party. He served as Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, and was a European Commissioner for Trade. However, his association with Jeffrey Epstein has cast a shadow over his legacy.
In June 2023, reports surfaced detailing the extent of Mandelson’s interactions with Epstein. A dossier from JPMorgan Chase revealed that Epstein maintained a “particularly close relationship” with Mandelson. The report highlighted multiple contacts between the two, including Epstein’s correspondence with Jes Staley, a senior JPMorgan executive, referencing Mandelson shortly after his return to the Labour government as Business Secretary. The Guardian
Further scrutiny emerged in October 2024, when Mandelson’s candidacy for the Chancellorship of the University of Oxford faced opposition from students concerned about his ties to Epstein. The student body questioned the appropriateness of appointing someone with such associations to a prestigious academic position. Cherwell
These revelations have prompted calls for an independent investigation into Mandelson’s involvement with Epstein. A petition addressed to Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer urged the suspension of Mandelson’s party membership pending an inquiry into the nature of his relationship with the disgraced financier. iPetitions
Donald Trump’s Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein
Donald Trump’s association with Jeffrey Epstein dates back to the late 1980s and 1990s, a period during which both men were prominent figures in New York’s social scene. Trump, a real estate mogul and television personality, and Epstein, a financier with a penchant for mingling with the elite, were often seen at the same events and shared a social circle that included numerous celebrities and politicians.
In November 2024, recordings from 2017 were released, revealing Epstein describing Trump as his “closest friend for 10 years.” In these tapes, Epstein provided candid insights into their relationship, characterising Trump as a “horrible human being” who engaged in unscrupulous behaviour, including affairs with his friends’ wives. Epstein’s portrayal of Trump was unflattering, suggesting a complex and morally dubious association between the two men. The Guardian
Despite their past camaraderie, Trump has sought to distance himself from Epstein in recent years. He has downplayed their relationship, stating in 2019, “I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him. I was not a fan.” However, evidence suggests that their interactions were more frequent and cordial than Trump has acknowledged. Notably, in the early 2000s, the two reportedly fell out over a real estate deal involving an oceanfront mansion in Palm Beach, which Trump purchased for $41 million, outbidding Epstein. The Washington Post
In October 2024, further allegations surfaced when former model Stacey Williams accused Trump of groping her in 1993 during an encounter facilitated by Epstein. Williams claimed that the incident felt like a “twisted game” between the two men, highlighting the predatory environment fostered by Epstein and implicating Trump in inappropriate behaviour. BBC
Implications and Controversies
The associations of both Mandelson and Trump with Jeffrey Epstein have sparked significant public and media scrutiny, raising questions about their judgment and the extent of their involvement in Epstein’s illicit activities.
For Peter Mandelson, the revelations have been particularly damaging given his appointment as Britain’s ambassador to the United States. Critics argue that his ties to Epstein could undermine his credibility and effectiveness in the role, especially when engaging with an administration led by Donald Trump, who has his own controversial history with Epstein. The Labour Party will face pressure to address these concerns transparently to maintain public trust.
In Donald Trump’s case, his renewed presidency has brought his past associations back into the spotlight. The release of Epstein’s tapes and new allegations of sexual misconduct have reignited debates about Trump’s character and suitability for office. While his core supporters may remain steadfast, these controversies could pose challenges to his administration’s domestic and international agenda.
The connections between Jeffrey Epstein, Peter Mandelson, and Donald Trump exemplify the far-reaching impact of Epstein’s network among the global elite. As more information is exposed by the independent media (the corporate media is usually obedient), it is imperative for public figures to address their past associations with transparency and accountability. The cases of Mandelson and Trump serve as reminders of the importance of ethical conduct and the scrutiny that accompanies positions of power and influence.
In the coming months, both men will need to navigate the repercussions of their links to Epstein, balancing their political responsibilities with the imperative to restore public confidence. The unfolding narrative will undoubtedly influence their legacies and the broader discourse on the accountability of public officials.
The independent media must continue to expose these people as unfit for any public office for the sake of democracy everywhere.
