On Monday 4 December from 8:45 a.m. until 10 a.m., a group of Dorset residents will join about 500 others around the country holding signs outside Bournemouth Crown Court, as part of the growing public campaign Defend Our Juries.
Their signs display the centuries-old principle of ‘jury equity’, ie the right of all jurors in British courtrooms to acquit a defendant according to their conscience and irrespective of the directions of the judge. Famously, in 1984, a jury acquitted the civil servant, Clive Ponting, on this principle after he exposed government misinformation to the public and Parliament concerning the ‘Falklands War’
Risk of arrest
By displaying these signs, the group runs the risk of arrest. In September, the Solicitor General announced he would prosecute the 68-year retired social worker, Trudi Warner, for contempt of court, for holding a similar sign outside Inner London Crown Court in March. Then in October, two young women were arrested by the MET police for doing the same thing.
Collective action works
There are strong indications that united, collective action to defend the principle of jury equity is proving effective. Just days after the Solicitor General’s announcement to prosecute Warner, 252 people gathered outside 25 crown courts across England and Wales, holding similar signs in solidarity with Trudi Warner. None were arrested and there has been no indication of a police investigation since then. An investigation into people previously arrested for displaying posters with the same message has now been discontinued.
The Defend our Juries campaign has gathered powerful support from eminent professors of law, such as Professor Richard Vogler and Professor John Spencer. In the words of Professor Vogler:
“George Orwell noticed the tendency of repressive law to degenerate into farce, when truth becomes a lie and common sense is heresy. This is worth remembering now that the solicitor general, Michael Tomlinson KC, has concluded that it is right to take action against … Trudi Warner, for holding up a sign outside a criminal court, simply proclaiming one of the fundamental principles of the common law: the right of a jury to decide a case according to its conscience.”
Mounting concern over jury trial
In March of this year, Dorset resident and Portland Town Councillor, Giovanna Lewis, was jailed for breaking a crown court judge’s ruling by explaining to the jury why she had taken action – she was trying to influence government to help prevent deaths from fuel poverty and climate change in the UK and around the world. Giovanna says that ‘during my trial I never once heard the jury being told they could base their verdict on either their conscience or conviction, instead being told it was only lawful to base their judgements on legal technicalities.”
The demonstrations come amid mounting public concern that political trials, such as the trial over the toppling of the statue of the slave-trader Edward Colston into Bristol harbour, are being turned into show trials, after a succession of jury acquittals, including the acquittal of the Colston 4 in January 2022, have embarrassed the Government and certain corporate interests. In the Colston case, Suella Braverman, who was Attorney General at the time, decided that the jury of Bristol people had got it wrong, and brought a successful appeal to the Court of Appeal, changing the law.
Measures to stop juries reaching not guilty verdicts
Measures being taken by courts in response include defendants being banned from explaining to the jury why they did what they did, even people who have taken peaceful direct action are now being sent to prison for up to 3 years. In some cases, people have been sent to prison just for trying to explain their actions to the jury for saying the words ‘climate change’ and ‘fuel poverty’ in court. Defendants are banned from explaining the principle of ‘jury equity’ to the jury, even though it is a well established principle of law, which is set in marble at the original entrance to the Old Bailey.
Local residents take part
Explaining why they are prepared to risk arrest for this legal principle local resident:
Peter Aldous, 77, retired Ship’s Captain; lives in Blandford Forum, born in Bournemouth. The jury system has been the basis of our justice system for centuries. Defendants must be allowed to state the whole truth and jurors must be allowed to make a decision based on their conscience. Politically-inspired judicial prejudice must not be allowed.
And local resident:
Daniel Glennon, 51, a customer service trainer from Bournemouth said “I’m taking part in this action because I believe that our legal system should not stop defendants from telling the whole truth in court. Jurors should be free to make the decision they feel is right based on the full information. Our corrupt government, financed by fossil fuel interests, is hell bent on suppressing peaceful protest and manipulating legal cases involving activists. I’m here today to deliver a clear message – this will not stand and I’m willing to be arrested to make this point crystal clear.”
And a third resident:
Name: Liz Elwick
Age: 71
Retired Nurse and Local Authority Worker
From: Bournemouth
‘Clearly its vital for British Citizens to have faith in their legal system and therefore jurors must be allowed to acquit a defendant if their conscience tells them to do so.
About Defend our Juries
Defend our Juries is a new campaign with the following aims;:
- to bring to public attention the programme to undermine trial by jury in the context of those taking action to expose government dishonesty and corporate greed
- to raise awareness of the vital constitutional safeguard that juries can acquit a defendant as a matter of conscience, irrespective of a judge’s direction that there is no available defence (a principle also known as ‘jury equity’ or ‘jury nullification‘)
- to ensure that all defendants have the opportunity to explain their actions when their liberty is at stake, including by explaining their motivations and beliefs.
See Defend Our Juries website: https://defendourjuries.org/
“Defying a judge is not always contempt of court” (The Times, behind a paywall)
“Trudi Warner reveals the dark secret of English courts: juries do have the right to follow their consciences” (The Guardian, 27 September)
“A climate of injustice” (the Ecologist)
“Charge us with contempt too, say 40 people, if climate activist prosecuted” (Guardian, 17 August)
See also the short film, “Right to Acquit”
If you would like your interests… published, submit via https://dorseteye.com/submit-a-report/
Join us in helping to bring reality and decency back by SUBSCRIBING to our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ1Ll1ylCg8U19AhNl-NoTg SUPPORTING US where you can: Award Winning Independent Citizen Media Needs Your Help. PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST £2 A MONTH https://dorseteye.com/donate/
