Some white men and women have been taken in by some very sinister and alarming types. From renowned rapists to paedophiles to violent criminals. It sadly says a lot about their gullibility and inability to pursue decency over wickedness and immorality. It is also very scary if any of these people have children themselves and how vulnerable they will become.
Many revelations are occurring that expose the rancid behaviour that many are succumbing to. The following report by The Guardian exposed almost half of those who were convicted following the far-right rioting of 2024 as domestic abusers…
The Guardian Exposes The Dark Secret Of Those Arrested During 2024 Far-Right Rioting
And another that exposed sex crimes and terrorism.
And now another detailed investigation, this time into the case of Anthony Styles, reveals a profound case of criminal hypocrisy at the heart of anti-refugee activism and the far-right’s weaponisation of women’s safety.
Introduction: The Moral Crusader
For months, Anthony Styles, operating under the YouTube persona ‘AJ Audits’, positioned himself as a stalwart defender of British values and a protector of women and children. From his wheelchair, he became a familiar fixture at far-right demonstrations, livestreaming protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers across London and Essex. His rhetoric was incendiary: he and his followers routinely smeared refugees as inherent “sexual predators” and a dire threat to the safety of local girls.
This narrative, however, has been catastrophically shattered. An investigation can now reveal that Anthony Styles, the self-appointed moral guardian, is in fact a convicted paedophile, a lifelong registered sex offender, and a perpetrator of the very crimes he so vocally—and hypocritically—claimed to oppose.
The Unmasking: A Fake Press Pass and a Criminal Past
The façade began to crumble due to a critical error. Last month, Styles attended a protest brandishing a homemade press pass. His name, printed clearly on the credential, was spotted by activists from the group Stand Up To Racism (SUTR). Their subsequent investigation into his background uncovered a deeply disturbing criminal history, which was later confirmed by a Times investigation with police sources.
The details of Styles’s past are not merely allegations; they are proven convictions from British courts:
- Indecent Assault of a Child: In 2017, at Preston Crown Court, Styles was sentenced to four and a half years in prison for the indecent assault of a girl under the age of 14. The court heard how the abuse occurred in 1993 at a flat in Blackpool, where Styles assaulted the young victim as she sat on his knee after school. The girl, known to him through his partner’s family, was a frequent visitor to the flat. In a personal statement, she detailed the lasting psychological harm his actions caused.
- Sexual Assault of a Teenager and Possession of Indecent Images: Five years prior, in 2012, Styles admitted to sexually assaulting a 17-year-old girl. In the same case, he also pleaded guilty to possessing a cache of 307 indecent images of children. For these offences, he received a three-year community order.
As a result of these convictions, the courts imposed severe and lasting restrictions:
- He was placed on the sex offenders register for life.
- He was given an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO), designed to tightly control his behaviour and access to potential victims.
A Pattern of Deception and Endangerment
Most alarmingly, Styles deliberately concealed this history from the very communities he claimed to protect. He joined protests, often organised in response to genuine and abhorrent crimes committed by individuals, where concerned parents—unaware of his predatory past—frequently brought their young children.
He operated not just as a participant but as a prominent documentarian of the movement, using his YouTube channel to amplify its message while hiding in plain sight behind a fake press pass. This deception allowed a convicted child sex offender to integrate himself into gatherings where children were present, all while he filmed himself decrying the supposed threat posed by outsiders.
The Wider Context: Hypocrisy and Political Football
This case is not viewed in isolation by anti-racism campaigners and researchers. It is seen as emblematic of a deeply troubling trend within far-right circles.
Lewis Nielsen of Stand Up to Racism stated: “These revelations show the far right has never cared about women’s rights; they’ve been harbouring convicted offenders in their midst. The hypocrisy is off the charts. This man has claimed to be protecting women and girls while hiding his own convictions. Refugees aren’t the threat to women; the real threat is far-right fanboys of Elon Musk.”
The data appears to support this claim. Research indicates a disproportionate number of individuals with convictions for child sex offences within groups like the English Defence League (EDL). Furthermore, a staggering 40% of men arrested over far-right riots last summer had previous complaints of domestic violence made against them.
For months, these anti-refugee groups have propagated a narrative that asylum seekers constitute a “criminal community” of rapists and paedophiles. The case of Anthony Styles fundamentally undermines this smeer campaign. It demonstrates that the threat of sexual violence is not confined to any one ethnicity or nationality; it is a societal issue perpetrated by individuals, often known to their victims and, as this case shows, sometimes hiding behind a mask of moral righteousness.
Conclusion: The Real Threat to Women and Children
The expose of Anthony Styles is a stark lesson in the dangers of political manipulation and the weaponisation of genuine societal issues. Sexual violence is a grave crime that should be treated with utmost seriousness and addressed through robust, evidence-based policy—not used as a political football to stoke hatred against minority groups.
The far-right’s narrative has been critically wounded by one of its own standard-bearers. It reveals a movement that, while quick to point fingers at vulnerable communities, is dangerously unwilling to scrutinise the criminals in its own ranks.
As Simon Magorian of Stand Up To Racism concludes, the imperative is clear: to stand with the actual victims of sexual violence and to challenge the faulty, hate-fuelled narratives that allow predators like Styles to operate undetected. The real threat to women and children, this case suggests, may be lurking much closer to home than they would have the public believe.
By not standing up to these people, we become complicit ourselves. Many women and children become vulnerable. Only by joining in solidarity and exposing and then challenging them together can we begin to rid ourselves of this scourge.
