Remember this from 2017? When Ms Kuenssberg turned a Tory lie and U turn onto Jeremy Corbyn to distract the public?
Laura Kuenssberg, the prominent BBC political editor from 2015 to 2022 and now presenter of the broadcaster’s Sunday politics show, has long been a figure of significant influence in British political journalism. However, her tenure has been marred by accusations of persistent bias, particularly a conservative slant, in her reporting and presentation. Though Kuenssberg is regarded as a respected journalist by many, her critics argue that her approach to political coverage often subtly, and at times overtly, favours the Conservative Party. These claims have been bolstered by a series of gaffes, editorial decisions, and public reactions that suggest a consistent bias in her reporting. The latest incident, where Kuenssberg accidentally sent her briefing notes for an interview with Boris Johnson directly to the former prime minister, further adds to the perception that her coverage disproportionately favours right-wing figures.
The Latest Gaffe: Boris Johnson’s Briefing Notes
Kuenssberg has made the headlines, this month, after mistakenly sending Boris Johnson her briefing notes ahead of an interview with him. The interview was highly anticipated, as Johnson was set to promote his new pack of lies and implicit nihilism, Unleashed. However, after the error, the BBC cancelled the interview, stating that the mistake made the interview “untenable” and compromised its integrity. Kuenssberg herself admitted that the mistake was “embarrassing and disappointing,” yet stressed that “honesty is the best policy.” Erm!!
While such errors can happen to anyone, this incident only serves to reinforce the narrative that Kuenssberg’s relationship with high-profile Conservative figures is too close for comfort. In a world where journalistic neutrality is paramount, such an error casts doubt on the objectivity of the BBC’s political coverage, particularly when interviewing divisive figures like Boris Johnson.
Accusations of Conservative Bias
The accusations against Kuenssberg are not new. Over the years, she has faced criticism for various instances where her coverage seemed to favour the Conservatives. One of the most notable examples occurred during the 2016 Brexit referendum. Kuenssberg’s reporting was widely seen as being more sympathetic to the Leave campaign and, by extension, to Conservative politicians like Boris Johnson and Michael Gove, who spearheaded the effort.
For instance, during the Brexit debates, Kuenssberg frequently framed Remain arguments as lacking direction or substance, while offering detailed coverage of Leave campaign talking points. In her interviews with pro-Leave figures like Boris Johnson, her tone was often perceived as accommodating, with fewer hard-hitting follow-up questions. In contrast, her interviews with Remain supporting figures appeared more combative. Although journalism often involves holding those in power accountable, the frequency and manner in which she questioned non-Conservative politicians led to claims of an imbalanced approach.
Additionally, Kuenssberg was criticised for her coverage of the 2017 General Election, particularly during her interactions with then-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. During one press conference, Kuenssberg’s questioning of Corbyn was notably aggressive, while her interactions with Conservative leaders seemed softer by comparison. This contrast fuelled allegations of bias, with critics accusing her of shaping the narrative to favour the Conservatives.
“Accidental” Tweeting of Conservative Talking Points
In a particularly controversial episode, Kuenssberg faced significant backlash in 2019 for “accidentally” tweeting a Conservative Party press release almost verbatim during the General Election campaign. This incident occurred just hours after Boris Johnson delivered a speech, and Kuenssberg’s tweet echoed Conservative Party talking points, praising Johnson’s leadership style and reiterating key messages from the party’s platform.
While Kuenssberg later claimed that the tweet had been a mistake and that she had not intended to repeat the Conservative line without attribution, the damage was done. Social media erupted with accusations that the BBC’s political editor was too close to the Tories, undermining the supposed neutrality of her role. The incident was particularly damning because it reinforced a pattern of behaviour in which Kuenssberg’s public statements appeared to align with Conservative messaging, whether through her tone, framing, or outright dissemination of their content.
BBC Complaints and Trust in Impartiality
The criticisms against Kuenssberg are not isolated to social media reactions or vocal opponents of the Conservative Party. In 2020, the BBC faced a formal complaint over Kuenssberg’s coverage of the 2019 General Election. The BBC Trust found that her reporting on the resignation of a Labour Party aide had breached impartiality guidelines. Kuenssberg inaccurately claimed that an aide to Jeremy Corbyn had been punched by a Conservative supporter, a statement that turned out to be false. Although Kuenssberg later corrected her report, the damage had been done, with many accusing her of not fact-checking properly before broadcasting a misleading narrative.
While some defended Kuenssberg by arguing that her role as the BBC’s political editor necessitated a rapid response to events, her critics pointed to this as further evidence of an underlying bias. Her initial, erroneous report about the incident played into the hands of the Conservative Party’s narrative, portraying Labour as out of touch and ineffectual in the face of public hostility. The BBC eventually had to issue an apology for the misleading coverage, but by that time, the story had already entered the public discourse.
The BBC and Right-Wing Leanings
The broader question of the BBC’s political stance also looms large in the discussion about Kuenssberg’s bias. While the BBC is publicly funded and mandated to remain impartial, recent years have seen growing accusations that the corporation has shifted towards a more conservative-friendly editorial stance. Kuenssberg’s reporting fits into this wider context, where critics argue that the BBC has become increasingly hesitant to hold the Conservative government to account.
A prominent example of this was the BBC’s decision in 2019 to edit footage of Boris Johnson during a Remembrance Day event to remove a scene where he appeared dishevelled and awkward. The edited footage showed Johnson in a more statesmanlike light, raising concerns that the BBC was shielding the Prime Minister from negative coverage. While Kuenssberg was not directly involved in this editorial decision, it was emblematic of the broader concerns about the BBC’s treatment of Conservative politicians.
Kuenssberg’s coverage of Conservative policies, such as austerity measures, has also been criticised. While austerity was a deeply contentious policy that affected millions of people across the UK, Kuenssberg’s framing often highlighted the necessity of the cuts, without equally emphasising the voices of those suffering from the consequences. This led to accusations that she was giving undue weight to Conservative arguments, without adequately scrutinising the human cost of such policies.
Kuenssberg and Boris Johnson: A Special Relationship?
The repeated association of Kuenssberg with Conservative figures like Boris Johnson has further fuelled accusations of bias. Her close access to high-ranking Conservative politicians has often led to questions about the nature of her reporting. In 2020, for example, Kuenssberg was criticised for downplaying the significance of the scandal involving Dominic Cummings, Johnson’s senior adviser, who had breached lockdown rules by travelling across the country. Kuenssberg’s initial reports were sympathetic to Cummings, framing the story as a non-issue despite widespread public outrage. This led to further complaints that Kuenssberg was acting as a mouthpiece for the government, rather than an impartial journalist holding power to account.
Moreover, Kuenssberg’s continued access to Boris Johnson throughout his political career, including after he left the role of prime minister, has raised questions about her proximity to the former Conservative leader. The most recent incident, in which she mistakenly sent her briefing notes to Johnson, only exacerbates these concerns. It suggests not only a logistical failure but also a deeper familiarity with Johnson that makes it harder for the public to trust that Kuenssberg can maintain a critical distance in her interviews with him.
Examples of Media Criticism
Several media watchdogs and commentators have expressed concern over Kuenssberg’s perceived bias. The New Statesman, a left-leaning publication, has published multiple critiques of Kuenssberg’s reporting, arguing that she regularly frames political issues in ways that favour Conservative politicians. One particular example came from a New Statesman article that noted how Kuenssberg’s coverage of Theresa May’s failed Brexit negotiations often portrayed May as a victim of an uncooperative Parliament, rather than as a leader responsible for her own political failings.
Similarly, The Guardian has highlighted Kuenssberg’s role in amplifying right-wing talking points, particularly in her coverage of the 2019 General Election. In a scathing editorial, The Guardian argued that Kuenssberg’s reporting consistently downplayed Labour’s chances while presenting Conservative electoral victories as inevitable and logical, creating a self-fulfilling narrative.
The Defence of Kuenssberg
It’s important to acknowledge that Kuenssberg has her defenders, who argue that accusations of bias are overstated or politically motivated. Some point out that the nature of political journalism in the UK, where political reporters rely on close relationships with politicians for information, makes it difficult to avoid accusations of bias entirely. Others argue that Kuenssberg’s reporting is simply reflective of the political realities of the day, where the Conservatives have held power for over a decade, and therefore naturally dominate the political narrative.
Moreover, defenders argue that the scrutiny Kuenssberg faces is disproportionate, given that other high-profile political journalists, both at the BBC and elsewhere, also make mistakes or demonstrate apparent biases. The BBC itself has consistently stood by Kuenssberg, arguing that her reporting adheres to the corporation’s strict impartiality guidelines. Erm!
A Pattern of Bias?
Ultimately, while Laura Kuenssberg is a highly experienced journalist with considerable achievements, the evidence of her conservative bias is compelling. From her sympathetic framing of Conservative policies to her frequent “errors” that seem to favour right-wing figures, there is a discernible pattern in her work that has raised legitimate concerns about her impartiality. Her recent gaffe involving Boris Johnson only adds fuel to the fire, reinforcing the perception that her relationship with Conservative politicians is too cosy for a journalist in her position.
While Kuenssberg may argue that her mistakes are unintentional, the cumulative effect of these incidents has damaged her reputation in the eyes of many who expect the BBC’s political editor to uphold a higher standard of impartiality. As public trust in the media continues to wane, it’s crucial for the BBC to address these concerns head-on, ensuring that its political coverage truly reflects the diverse perspectives within British society.
This is how to do it Laura
KEEP US ALIVE and join us in helping to bring reality and decency back by SUBSCRIBING to our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ1Ll1ylCg8U19AhNl-NoTg AND SUPPORTING US where you can: Award Winning Independent Citizen Media Needs Your Help. PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST £2 A MONTH https://dorseteye.com/donate/
