A major study, delving into the underbelly of British social media, has revealed the alarming extent to which far-right, fascist ideologies are festering and growing in online spaces largely invisible to the mainstream public. This isn’t merely a case of heightened political disagreement; the analysis paints a picture of a coordinated, psychological operation that follows a historic fascist playbook. Its ultimate goal is the systematic erosion of democratic foundations to be replaced by an authoritarian, nationalist state.
The investigation, focusing on large-scale Facebook groups, uncovers a world where populist grievances are weaponised, meticulously channelled into a pipeline of radicalisation. This process is not always overtly led by jackbooted militants; often, it is an organised, clandestine effort driven by political entrepreneurs, influencers, and automated algorithms, all working in concert to create a citizenry primed for fascist ideas.
The Playbook: A Five-Pronged Attack on Democracy
The research identifies five key themes, which together form a coherent strategy to dismantle liberal democracy.
1. The Deliberate Demolition of Trust
The first and most crucial step is to sever the public’s trust in the pillars of a free society. The sample revealed about two in five posts were dedicated to vilifying core institutions. The political establishment, judiciary, police, and media were not merely criticised; they were branded as “traitors,” “two-tier,” and “controlled.”
How it’s organised: This isn’t organic frustration. As Professor Sander van der Linden of Cambridge University explains, undermining “institutions of truth, facts and education” is a classic fascist tactic because they are the primary obstacles to an authoritarian takeover. Political elites and opinion leaders, from Nigel Farage to far-right party leaders, knowingly “take a page out of the fascist playbook” to dupe regular people. By seeding narratives like “the mainstream media is lying to you,” they create a vacuum of authority, which they then fill themselves.
2. The Scapegoating Engine
With trust in institutions shattered, the movement needs a target for the public’s anger. Immigrants are cast in this role. While legitimate debates on immigration exist, the analysis differentiated these from outright dehumanisation. One in ten posts about immigration fell into the latter category, describing migrants as “parasites,” “scum,” “lice,” or an “invading” force.
How it’s organised: This is a calculated strategy of diversion. As Anki Deo of Hope Not Hate notes, legitimate grievances about the cost of living or public services are systematically redirected away from complex, structural causes and onto a simple, visible scapegoat. This creates a “toxic cocktail,” as Dr. Julia Ebner describes, where the gradual demonisation of an out-group lowers the barrier to justifying, and eventually committing, violence against them.
3. Manufacturing Victimhood and Nativist Identity
To bind followers together, the movement fosters a powerful sense of shared, victimised identity. The study found a strong vein of nativism, with nearly 2,000 posts pushing the idea that “indigenous,” “white,” “British” people had become “second-class citizens” in their own country.
How it’s organised: This leverages a powerful psychological mechanism. Professor van der Linden points to the “illusory truth effect”: the more often someone hears that they are being “replaced,” the more believable it becomes. This narrative of existential threat, amplified by thousands of repetitive posts, fosters what Dr. Ebner calls “identity fusion”—a feeling of oneness with the in-group. When combined with a demonised out-group, this fusion can tip individuals into violence, believing they are acting to “save” their people.
4. The Stealthy Mainstreaming of Extremism
A key feature of this modern operation is its stealth. Many users vehemently reject the “far-right” label, framing themselves as “True Brits” expressing common-sense concerns. This allows extreme ideas to infiltrate the mainstream under the guise of legitimate protest.
How it’s organised: The line between observer and participant is deliberately blurred. People can “dip in and out” of these online groups without formally joining a far-right organisation, making the movement seem broader and more acceptable. As Deo explains, this was evident during the 2024 riots, where participants were portrayed not as extremists, but as ordinary people finally standing up for their beliefs. This normalisation is turbocharged by social media algorithms, which connect isolated individuals into vast, validating echo chambers in seconds, creating a false perception of societal consensus.
5. Gateway Conspiracies
The final piece of the puzzle is the introduction of overarching conspiracy theories, which account for one in twenty posts. Concepts like the “Great Reset” or claims that the World Economic Forum are “puppeteers” controlling the government provide a grand, sinister explanation for the world’s problems.
How it’s organised: These conspiracies are not random. They are strategically seeded into groups already primed with distrust and nativist sentiment. As Van der Linden states, the community built around anti-immigration sentiment provides a perfect structure for “leaders” to introduce more extreme ideologies. Deo confirms that anti-immigration content often acts as an “entry point,” after which users are exposed to a full spectrum of conspiracy beliefs. These theories, as seen with Pizzagate and QAnon, have the power to galvanise movements and direct collective anger towards a singular, destructive goal.
The Clandestine Machinery
This five-pronged attack does not operate by accident. It is facilitated by a synergistic ecosystem:
- Political Actors:Â Parties like Reform UK, and influencers on platforms like GB News, broadcast the anti-establishment and nativist rhetoric that provides the initial fuel.
- Bad Actors & Amplifiers:Â Far-right groups and influencers with large followings deliberately seed disinformation and conspiracy theories, which are then amplified by grassroots members.
- The Algorithmic Engine:Â Social media algorithms, particularly Meta’s Facebook, actively recommend and promote this content because it drives high engagement. The platforms provide the unprecedented reach and speed that allows radicalisation to occur at a scale and pace never before possible.
- Policy Complicity:Â As Dr. Ebner warns, Meta’s recent reversal of takedown policies for certain content has created a permissive environment where this “rhetoric is welcome again.”
Conclusion: An Unfolding Threat
This study reveals that the growth of online fascism is not a spontaneous outbreak of bigotry. It is an organised, if often decentralised, operation. It uses a time-tested fascist strategy—demolish truth, identify a scapegoat, foster a victimised in-group, mainstream the ideology, and bind it together with conspiracy—but executes it with 21st-century digital tools.
The goal is clear: to break democracy by turning citizens against the institutions that protect them and against each other. By the time the violence spills onto the streets, as it did in Southport and elsewhere, the digital groundwork has been laid for years in clandestine online spaces, slowly convincing ordinary people that the destruction of democracy is the only way to save their country. The operation is well underway, and it is happening just beyond most people’s experience.
Inspired by
