Posh middle class boy sums up why the Labour Party is nothing more than an establishment propaganda machine.
Imagine the Labour Party in the 1960’s and look at it now. We now have slightly less psychopathic Tories.
just watched a PoliticsJoe video from Labour conference called "Asking young Starmerites why they hate Corbyn" and Jesus CHRIST man pic.twitter.com/kspcBjPxh7
— RP Corp International Division (@RPCorpIntl) October 4, 2024
As @DonahueRogers states:
“Labour under Jeremy Corbyn didn’t have a particular problem with antisemitism, it did however have a very real problem with the weaponisation of false and malicious accusations of antisemitism for political purposes.”
How Jeremy Corbyn’s Policies Would Have Rescued Britain
Jeremy Corbyn, the former leader of the Labour Party, had a political agenda rooted in principles of socialism, equality, and justice. His vision for Britain stood in stark contrast to the neoliberal policies that have shaped the country’s economy and society for decades. Corbyn’s manifesto, spanning from 2015 until his resignation in 2020, proposed an ambitious transformation of the UK’s economic system, public services, and foreign policy. Corbyn’s policies would have undoubtedly brought about significant changes, many of which could have addressed some of Britain’s most enduring challenges, such as inequality, underfunded public services, and environmental degradation.
One of Corbyn’s most defining proposals was a shift towards a fairer economic system. He advocated for a fundamental rebalancing of power between capital and labour, a move that could have significantly benefited the vast majority of Britons. At the core of his economic vision was the idea that the wealth generated by society should be shared more equitably. Corbyn’s commitment to renationalisation of key industries, including the railways, energy companies, water utilities, and Royal Mail, was a cornerstone of his economic strategy. He argued that these industries, which provide essential services, should not be run for private profit but instead be under public ownership, where the focus would be on the public good rather than shareholder dividends. The privatisation of these industries over recent decades has led to rising costs for consumers, deteriorating services, and a lack of accountability. Public ownership under Corbyn’s plan could have reversed these trends, offering more affordable and reliable services to millions of Britons, while ensuring that profits were reinvested into improving infrastructure and services rather than lining the pockets of a few.
Renationalisation of the railways, for example, would have offered a much needed solution to the chronic underfunding and poor performance that has plagued the UK’s railway system since privatisation in the 1990s. Corbyn’s proposal was to bring the railways back into public ownership as existing franchises expired, rather than paying to buy them out. This gradual approach would have meant minimal upfront costs while ultimately leading to a more integrated, efficient, and affordable public transport system. A publicly owned railway would have been able to prioritise long-term investments in infrastructure and innovation, rather than the short-term profitability goals of private companies. This would have not only improved services but also helped reduce carbon emissions by encouraging more people to use public transport instead of cars.
Corbyn’s plans for energy renationalisation were similarly ambitious and timely, especially given the current energy crisis. The energy market in the UK, largely privatised since the 1980s, has seen prices soar for consumers, while profits for energy companies have reached unprecedented levels. Under Corbyn’s proposals, energy companies would have been brought into public ownership, which would have allowed the government to control prices more effectively, ensuring that people could afford to heat their homes. Furthermore, this public control of energy would have enabled a faster and more coordinated transition towards renewable energy sources, which is essential in combating the climate crisis. Corbyn’s Green Industrial Revolution aimed to create hundreds of thousands of jobs in renewable energy, home insulation, and sustainable transport, which would have stimulated the economy while tackling climate change.
In terms of taxation and wealth redistribution, Corbyn’s policies were aimed at tackling the growing inequality that has characterised the UK economy for decades. One of his key proposals was to raise taxes on the wealthiest individuals and corporations, while ensuring that ordinary working people would not see a tax rise. The increased tax revenues would have been used to fund vital public services, including the NHS, education, and social care. Corbyn also advocated for closing loopholes that allow large corporations and wealthy individuals to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. This would have ensured a more equitable contribution from those who can afford it and would have helped to reduce the budget deficit without resorting to the austerity measures that have disproportionately hurt the poorest in society.
Speaking of austerity, Corbyn was one of its most vocal opponents. The Conservative-led governments from 2010 onwards pursued austerity policies, which involved deep cuts to public spending in the name of reducing the national debt. However, these policies had devastating effects on public services, the welfare system, and the living standards of millions of Britons. Corbyn argued that austerity was a political choice rather than an economic necessity, and that investment in public services and infrastructure would lead to economic growth and improved social outcomes. Had his policies been implemented, we would have seen a significant reversal of the cuts to local government, social care, and the NHS, which have left these services struggling to cope with rising demand.
One of Corbyn’s most popular and impactful policies was his commitment to the National Health Service (NHS). Under his leadership, Labour promised to end the creeping privatisation of the NHS, which has led to longer waiting times, reduced access to services, and higher costs. Corbyn’s vision was to fully fund the NHS by increasing investment, hiring more doctors, nurses, and other healthcare staff, and ensuring that the NHS remained free at the point of use. This would have been particularly vital in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where the underfunding and understaffing of the NHS has been laid bare. A well-funded, publicly owned NHS could have been better equipped to deal with the crisis, saving lives and reducing the strain on healthcare workers.
Corbyn’s education policies were similarly transformative. He proposed the abolition of university tuition fees, a move that would have significantly improved access to higher education for young people from less privileged backgrounds. The introduction of tuition fees under Tony Blair’s government in 1998, and their subsequent tripling under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition in 2010, has saddled young people with enormous levels of debt, which many will be paying off for most of their working lives. By scrapping tuition fees and restoring maintenance grants, Corbyn’s policies would have removed this financial burden, making university more accessible and allowing students to focus on their studies rather than worrying about debt. This would have had long-term benefits for social mobility and the economy, as more young people from diverse backgrounds would have been able to pursue higher education and develop the skills needed for a modern economy.
In addition to higher education reform, Corbyn also pledged to invest heavily in early years and primary education, ensuring that every child had access to a high-quality education regardless of their background. His plans included reducing class sizes, increasing funding for schools, and providing free school meals for all primary school children. These measures would have helped to tackle the persistent educational inequalities that exist in Britain, where children from disadvantaged backgrounds are often left behind. Corbyn’s commitment to lifelong learning, with the creation of a National Education Service, would have allowed people of all ages to access education and training, ensuring that workers could upskill or retrain throughout their careers, thus increasing productivity and economic resilience.
Another critical area where Corbyn’s policies would have had a profound impact is housing. The UK is in the midst of a housing crisis, with soaring house prices, rising rents, and a chronic shortage of affordable homes. Corbyn’s solution was to embark on the largest council house-building programme since the post-war era, with a commitment to building 100,000 new council homes each year. This would have helped to alleviate the housing crisis by increasing the supply of affordable homes, reducing homelessness, and giving more people the opportunity to live in secure, decent housing. Furthermore, Corbyn proposed rent controls to prevent private landlords from charging exorbitant rents, which would have provided much-needed relief for tenants, particularly in cities like London where the cost of renting has become unaffordable for many.
Corbyn’s approach to social justice extended beyond housing. His manifesto included bold commitments to tackle poverty and inequality, with a particular focus on supporting those who have been most affected by years of austerity. Corbyn proposed raising the minimum wage to £10 an hour, which would have lifted millions of low-paid workers out of poverty. He also promised to reverse cuts to welfare benefits, including the notorious Universal Credit system, which has pushed many people into poverty and homelessness due to delays and underpayments. By creating a more generous and humane welfare system, Corbyn’s policies would have provided a vital safety net for those in need, ensuring that nobody was left behind.
In terms of workers’ rights, Corbyn’s policies were designed to rebalance the scales between employers and employees. He pledged to strengthen trade unions, giving them more power to negotiate for better pay and conditions, and to introduce sectoral collective bargaining, which would have ensured that wages were negotiated at the industry level rather than on a company-by-company basis. This would have improved pay and conditions for millions of workers, particularly in low-paid sectors like hospitality and retail. Corbyn also promised to end the use of exploitative zero-hours contracts, which leave workers without job security or a guaranteed income, and to extend paid maternity and paternity leave, allowing families more flexibility and support in the crucial early years of their children’s lives.
Corbyn’s foreign policy also offered a significant departure from the status quo. He was a longstanding critic of military interventionism and the “war on terror,” which has led to disastrous conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. Corbyn argued that these interventions have not only caused immense human suffering but have also made the world less safe by fuelling extremism and instability. His approach to foreign policy was rooted in diplomacy, peace-building, and human rights, rather than military intervention. Corbyn pledged to end arms sales to repressive regimes, such as Saudi Arabia, which has been involved in a brutal war in Yemen. He also called for a foreign policy that prioritised tackling global poverty, climate change, and inequality, recognising that these are the root causes of many of the world’s conflicts.
Corbyn’s approach to Brexit was one of the most contested aspects of his leadership, but his stance was based on the principle of protecting workers’ rights and living standards. He advocated for a deal that would have kept the UK closely aligned with the EU on issues such as environmental standards, workers’ rights, and consumer protections, while allowing for some degree of autonomy. This approach could have avoided the economic damage that the current hard Brexit has caused, particularly in terms of trade and the disruption of supply chains. Corbyn also proposed putting any Brexit deal to a public vote, with the option to remain in the EU on the ballot. This would have given the British people a final say on the future of their relationship with Europe, ensuring that the decision was made democratically and transparently.
Corbyn’s environmental policies were some of the most ambitious seen in British politics. His Green Industrial Revolution aimed to make the UK carbon neutral by 2030, a full 20 years ahead of the current target. This would have been achieved through massive investments in renewable energy, public transport, and energy-efficient housing, creating hundreds of thousands of green jobs in the process. Corbyn’s commitment to environmental justice was closely tied to his vision for social justice, recognising that the effects of climate change disproportionately impact the poorest and most vulnerable. By tackling climate change in a way that also addressed inequality, Corbyn’s policies would have set Britain on a path towards a fairer and more sustainable future.
Jeremy Corbyn’s policies would have represented a radical departure from the neoliberal consensus that has dominated British politics for decades. His vision of a fairer, more equal society, with well-funded public services, decent housing, and a green economy, could have transformed Britain for the better. While his policies were often portrayed as unrealistic or too radical by the media and his political opponents, many of them address the root causes of the challenges Britain continues to face today, from inequality and poverty to climate change and underfunded public services. Had Corbyn’s policies been implemented, Britain could have seen a more just, prosperous, and sustainable future, where the wealth of the nation was shared more equitably, and everyone had the opportunity to thrive.
KEEP US ALIVE and join us in helping to bring reality and decency back by SUBSCRIBING to our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ1Ll1ylCg8U19AhNl-NoTg AND SUPPORTING US where you can: Award Winning Independent Citizen Media Needs Your Help. PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST £2 A MONTH https://dorseteye.com/donate/
