The man behind the Labour Party’s rear to the far right is revealed.
"When you heard that phrase, 'an island of strangers',
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) May 14, 2025
how did you feel?"@zarahsultana: "I was shocked. A Labour prime minister literally taking a quote from the Rivers of Blood speech which Enoch Powell delivered in my hometown of Birmingham. I couldn't actually believe it" pic.twitter.com/ORYJL7ahNR
Morgan McSweeney: The Unelected Architect Behind Labour’s Ruthless Realignment
Morgan McSweeney, a once-obscure political strategist from County Cork, has quietly emerged as one of the most influential — and controversial — figures in British politics. Now serving as Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, McSweeney wields enormous power behind the scenes, shaping Labour’s transformation from a broad church party to a tightly controlled centrist operation. His rise raises uncomfortable questions about accountability, transparency, and the future direction of the Labour movement.
From Building Sites to Backrooms
McSweeney’s journey from construction work in London to the corridors of Westminster is often presented as a story of grit and ambition. But this narrative masks a deeper truth: his ascent was less about public service and more about mastering the dark arts of internal party politics. After joining Labour in 1997, he embedded himself in backroom operations, eventually building a career not on public-facing policy work but on ruthless organisational control.
Anti-Extremism or Political Gatekeeping?
His early work opposing far-right groups like the BNP in Barking and Dagenham is commendable. Yet this anti-extremist branding has been repurposed to justify a clampdown on the Labour left. McSweeney has consistently framed internal opposition as “extremism,” allowing him to centralise power and marginalise dissent under the guise of electability.
Labour Together and the Donor Transparency Scandal
As director of the Labour Together think tank, McSweeney helped orchestrate the party’s shift away from its Corbyn-era politics. But his tenure was marred by controversy: the group was fined for failing to report over £730,000 in donations. While his defenders claimed it was a bureaucratic oversight, critics saw it as emblematic of a political operator willing to blur ethical lines in pursuit of influence.
The Starmer Project: Centralisation and Control
McSweeney was the chief strategist behind Keir Starmer’s 2020 leadership campaign — a campaign that promised party unity and integrity but delivered purges and policy retreats. Once Starmer took over, McSweeney tightened his grip as Chief of Staff and later as Director of Campaigns. Under his stewardship, candidate selections have been tightly vetted, with left-wing hopefuls sidelined. McSweeney’s Labour is one where conformity trumps grassroots democracy.
His influence is compared to that of Dominic Cummings and not without reason. Like Cummings, McSweeney operates in the shadows, yet leaves a massive footprint. But while Cummings championed radical disruption, McSweeney’s version of reform appears to revolve around restoring establishment control and neutralising ideological passion.
Political Vision: Austerity-Lite in Patriotism’s Clothing?
Ideologically, McSweeney’s strategy leans toward a hybrid of conservative social cues and cautious fiscal policy, an attempt to woo back disillusioned voters without unsettling the establishment. This triangulation may be electorally pragmatic, but it has left many wondering what Labour truly stands for. His brand of politics is often described as “realistic”—but” critics argue it’s merely timid and technocratic.
Influence Without Accountability
Despite being one of the most powerful figures in UK politics, McSweeney has never held elected office. He is not answerable to the public, yet he has helped redraw the ideological contours of Britain’s official opposition and now its government. For a party that once prided itself on internal democracy and movement politics, McSweeney’s rise represents a stark shift: power concentrated in the hands of an unelected strategist, answerable to no one but the leader he helped install.
The McSweeney Paradox
Morgan McSweeney is hailed by centrists as the architect of Labour’s return to “electability,” but” his methods betray a deeper insecurity about the public’s appetite for radical change. His legacy may ultimately hinge on whether his strategy secures long-term success or hollows out the party’s soul in exchange for short-term gains. Either way, McSweeney is not just a backroom operator anymore; he is the face of Labour’s new machine, one that critics say looks increasingly like the very system it once sought to challenge.
Remember:
