Ok folks get your head around this one! At Dorset Health Scrutiny Meeting last week, part of a campaigner’s (factual) statement was redacted – it related to the Local Gov Ombudsman enquiry about the ‘old’ chair’s voting record (he voted 3 different ways at 3 different meetings (one local, one county, and one cross county) on the same issue in the space of a week – and, yes, you’ve guessed it, on ‘Referral to the Secretary of State!

So, at the meeting we get told that the Monitoring Officer decided to redact this in the absence of a new chair who needed to be voted in and who would then get to decide. And, guess who the committee then voted in as the new chair – yep the ‘old’ chair! One Cllr Bill Pipe.

So the public never got to hear what had been redacted – because the new chair, who was the ‘old’ chair didn’t want facts about himself read out to the public!

You really couldn’t make up this stuff!

Giovanna Lewis

To report this post you need to login first.
Previous articleWarning to young people over use of Xanax
Next articleAre the CCG leading NHS campaigners down wrong path?
Dorset Eye
Dorset Eye is an independent not for profit news website built to empower all people to have a voice. To be sustainable Dorset Eye needs your support. Please help us to deliver independent citizen news... by clicking the link below and contributing. Your support means everything for the future of Dorset Eye. Thank you.