Alexey Navalny, the prominent figure in anti-Kremlin activism, solidified his leadership by exposing corruption within the Russian government through compelling videos. One of his revelations, a 113-minute exposé featuring a $1.31 billion palace supposedly built for President Vladimir Putin by Russia’s wealthiest oligarchs on the Black Sea coast, has amassed nearly 130 million views on YouTube and has become a catalyst for widespread protests, challenging Putin’s carefully cultivated image as a selfless leader devoted to the welfare of all Russians.

Navalny’s investigative prowess is showcased in the meticulously crafted video, complete with drone footage, blueprints, and images that paint a vivid picture of opulence reminiscent of a James Bond movie villain’s hideaway. This release, coupled with numerous other videos from Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation, has not only garnered tens of millions of views but has also fuelled protests, undermining Putin’s narrative.

Yet, Navalny’s trajectory into the forefront of opposition politics took an unexpected turn when one of his earlier videos conveyed a strikingly different message. In a 2007 pro-gun rights video, Navalny identified himself as a “certified nationalist,” advocating the elimination of “flies and cockroaches.” The video, released by the Russian National Liberation Movement—a nationalist group co-founded by Navalny—portrayed him shooting an actor wearing a keffiyeh who simulated an “attack.”

This nationalist stance led to Navalny’s expulsion from Yabloko, Russia’s oldest liberal democratic party, due to his “nationalist views” and participation in the Russian March—an annual rally of far-right nationalists. Lev Ponomaryov, a seasoned human rights advocate, severed ties with Navalny over their ideological differences regarding the future of Russian politics.

The late 2000s witnessed a surge in nationalism in post-Soviet Russia, fuelled by economic growth from high oil prices but accompanied by a dire workforce shortage, leading to increased labor migration. Navalny, initially aligned with nationalist sentiments, attended the Russian Marches, describing them as “significant political events.”

In 2013, Navalny shifted his focus by running for Moscow mayor on an anti-migrant platform, securing 27 percent of the vote. Subsequently, he distanced himself from the Russian Marches and toned down his nationalist rhetoric, redirecting his attention toward anti-corruption investigations and expanding the reach of his Anti-Corruption Foundation.

Navalny’s transformation into a formidable opposition leader unfolded through his ability to mobilise diverse political protesters across Russia. While his views evolved, attracting support from various political spectrums, the controversy surrounding his past nationalist stance resurfaced when Amnesty International stripped him of his “prisoner of conscience” status. Navalny denounced Amnesty’s decision, but observers questioned the sincerity of his departure from his nationalist past, citing recent statements supporting anti-migrant measures.

Now contrast this with Julian Assange who is locked up in a British prison

Julian Assange, the Australian-born journalist and founder of WikiLeaks, has been a prominent and controversial figure in the world of information dissemination. WikiLeaks, established in 2006, gained global attention for its commitment to transparency and the release of classified and confidential documents.

Born on July 3, 1971, in Townsville, Australia, Julian Assange developed an early interest in computers and hacking. In the 1980s and 1990s, he became involved in various hacking communities, gaining skills that would later play a crucial role in the formation of WikiLeaks. Assange’s commitment to information transparency and his belief in holding powerful institutions accountable for their actions became the driving forces behind his endeavours.

WikiLeaks was officially launched in 2006, with the mission of providing a secure platform for whistleblowers to anonymously leak sensitive documents exposing government and corporate misconduct. Assange, along with a team of technologically savvy individuals, created a platform that promised to protect sources and challenge the prevailing secrecy in international affairs.

WikiLeaks gained international attention with its high-profile releases of classified documents, such as the Iraq War Logs, Afghan War Diary, and the infamous release of U.S. diplomatic cables in 2010. These revelations shed light on hidden truths, exposed corruption, and ignited debates on issues ranging from military conduct to diplomatic relations. While some hailed Assange as a champion of free speech and transparency, others criticised him for jeopardising national security.

Assange’s methods of obtaining and publishing classified information raised ethical questions about the responsibility of journalists and the potential harm caused by unredacted releases. The legal implications surrounding WikiLeaks intensified when Assange faced unsubstantiated allegations of sexual misconduct in Sweden, leading to his arrest in the United Kingdom. These charges were dropped in 2019, with no evidence ever submitted.

In 2012, Assange sought asylum in the Embassy of Ecuador in London to avoid extradition to Sweden, fearing that it could eventually lead to his extradition to the United States. The U.S. government had been investigating Assange and WikiLeaks for their role in the publication of classified documents, which raised concerns about the balance between press freedom and national security.

After spending seven years in the Ecuadorian Embassy, Assange was arrested by British authorities in April 2019 and now resides in Belmarsh prison. The extradition battle that followed became a focal point of debates surrounding press freedom, government secrecy, and the role of whistleblowers in a democratic society. Supporters argued that Assange should be protected as a journalist, while critics contended that his actions jeopardised lives and compromised national security.

The story of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks is a complex narrative that encompasses issues of information transparency, press freedom, government accountability, and personal ethics. Assange’s actions have sparked crucial debates about the role of journalism, the limits of free speech, and the fine line between exposing the truth and endangering lives. As the legal proceedings continue, the legacy of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks will undoubtedly shape discussions on the evolving dynamics of information dissemination in the digital age.

What can we conclude?

Those brave and decent enough in the west who reveal corruption and murderous intent are locked away to die. Those in Russia, who are racists and reveal corruption are locked away to die. It appears that the western media are comfortable critiquing the latter while virtually ignoring the former.

If you like our content, join us in helping to bring reality and decency back by SUBSCRIBING to our Youtube channel: AND SUPPORTING US where you can: Award Winning Independent Citizen Media Needs Your Help. PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST £2 A MONTH

To report this post you need to login first.
Previous articlePoor old Richard Tice (leader of Reform Party) gets owned again
Next articleLord Ian Austin suspended for potential ‘Islamophobic’ comments
Dorset Eye
Dorset Eye is an independent not for profit news website built to empower all people to have a voice. To be sustainable Dorset Eye needs your support. Please help us to deliver independent citizen news... by clicking the link below and contributing. Your support means everything for the future of Dorset Eye. Thank you.