Here, Russell Brand takes absolutely no prisoners. From attacking Boris Johnson to identifying how corporations fed the Nazi war machine for profit and ideological sympathies, Brand absolutely lays down serious punches.
Hugo Boss and the Nazis
Hugo Ferdinand Boss was a German fashion designer and businessman who founded the Hugo Boss AG fashion company in 1924. During World War II, the company, like many others in Germany at the time, was involved in the production of uniforms for the Nazi Party, specifically for the Schutzstaffel (SS), the paramilitary organisation under Adolf Hitler’s control.
Hugo Boss AG manufactured uniforms for various Nazi organisations, including the SS, the Hitler Youth, and the SA (Sturmabteilung), among others. The company also produced uniforms for other branches of the German military.
It’s important to note that Hugo Boss himself was an active member of the Nazi Party and a supporter of the regime. In 1931, he joined the Nazi Party and became a sponsor of the SS. Boss’s support for the Nazis extended beyond just producing uniforms; he was also involved in various activities that benefited the Nazi cause.
After World War II, Hugo Boss was interned by the French government and faced some consequences for his support of the Nazi regime. However, he was released fairly quickly and resumed control of his company in 1946. The company faced challenges in the post-war era, but it eventually managed to rebuild its brand and reputation.
Boris Johnson quipped about Chemical weapons in Syria
What sort of person jokes about something like this?
The use of chemical weapons in Syria has been a contentious and complex issue. Various parties have been accused of using chemical weapons in the Syrian conflict, and attributing responsibility for specific attacks can be challenging due to the chaotic nature of the conflict.
The Syrian government, led by President Bashar al-Assad, has been accused of using chemical weapons against its own people on multiple occasions. The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has documented several instances of chemical attacks in Syria, and there is strong evidence implicating the Syrian government in some of these cases.
Additionally, non-state actors, including some rebel groups and terrorist organisations, have also been accused of using chemical weapons in Syria, though on a smaller scale compared to the Syrian government’s alleged use.
As for the source of the chemical weapons, it’s important to note that Syria had a stockpile of chemical weapons prior to the outbreak of the conflict. Syria joined the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) in 2013, leading to the destruction of most of its declared chemical weapons stockpile under international supervision. However, there have been allegations that Syria may have retained some undeclared chemical weapons or chemical production capabilities.
Furthermore, it’s not always clear where specific chemical agents or munitions used in attacks came from, as some may have been domestically produced, while others may have been sourced externally.
How many died?
The Syrian conflict, which began in 2011, has resulted in a significant loss of life. The exact number of casualties is difficult to determine with precision due to the chaotic and protracted nature of the conflict, as well as challenges in obtaining accurate data. However, it is widely acknowledged that hundreds of thousands of people have died as a result of the conflict.
As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, various estimates put the death toll at over 400,000 to 600,000 people. This includes both combatants and civilians. It’s important to note that the situation in Syria has continued to evolve since that time, and the casualty figures may have increased since then.
The conflict has resulted in a humanitarian catastrophe, with millions of people displaced, widespread destruction, and numerous human rights violations and war crimes documented by international organizations. Efforts to bring about a resolution to the conflict and provide humanitarian assistance to those affected by it remain ongoing.
The establishment would not have been happy when the world was let in on their psychopathic secret then. Brand was just the person to do it.
Oh and this too!
This is not about defending Russell Brand from the sexual assault and rape allegations. No one actually knows because there was never a police investigation. This is currently just a corporate sting. If the police had been given the ‘information’ from the beginning, then we could take this seriously. Why that did not happen is because the corporations believe they know better than the criminal justice system. However, to be fair, they tend to run that too. Controlling the minds of the population appears to be more important than justice. As ever was.
One more thing from an ex lover of Brand’s
In 2006 I refused to have sex with Russell Brand. I was in his London flat. There was a lot of heavy petting and we were both down to our pants. He didn’t pressure me when I said no. He wasn’t angry or abusive. Everything that happened was consensual. I stayed the night in his…
— Samantha Pressdee (@SammiePressdee) September 16, 2023
People who make their minds up without clear legal facts are part of the problem.
Douglas James
If you would like your interests… published, submit via https://dorseteye.com/submit-a-report/
Join us in helping to bring reality and decency back by SUBSCRIBING to our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ1Ll1ylCg8U19AhNl-NoTg and SUPPORTING US where you can: Award Winning Independent Citizen Media Needs Your Help. PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST £2 A MONTH https://dorseteye.com/donate/
