Prime Minister,
I suppose we should look at why only 24% of voters trust their MP to represent their interests. (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29682077) We could just go with the fact that the Whip system is undemocratic, putting the aims of Party above the wishes of the electorate, and leave it at that, and it would be easy to correct if that was the only reason, but it isn’t. There’s also the issue of MP’s accepting, under a a cover of “reluctance” so thin that it puts photographers’ glass into the category of “totally opaque,” a pay rise of 11% while denying even a basic 1% to nurses because that would be “too expensive.”
The public out here are educated, Prime Minister. We can see, quite readily, that if a nurses’ pay rise of 1% – which is 1% of bugger-all when the truth is examined – will cost £450m, while the manufactured war against the Israeli-backed and funded ISIS will cost £3bn, then not participating in said war would free up funding for nurses’ increased pay for a total of 6.66(recurring) years, with future taxation taking the burden thenceforth. To the ordinary person, taking this path – which would have the added bonus of preventing Britain becoming an enhanced target for extremists – would be the reasonable measure. MP’s, however – on all sides of the House – have voted exactly the opposite way. When it comes to the necessary funding of the NHS, therefore, MP’s are not representing us; they are more concerned to keep the value of their shares in arms dealing and oil companies up. We see this with crystal clarity, so why is it that MP’s cannot see that we see it?
Then we can add in the inappropriate nominations made for the head of the Historic Child Abuse enquiry, with the second official chosen by the file-mislaying Home Office now being described as unsuitable because of her personal links with one of those under suspicion of sexual misconduct. (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/oct/22/fiona-woolf-recalled-home-affairs-committee-links-brittans) We, here in the Land of Struggling To Make Ends Meet, do not want anyone in charge of that enquiry who could be even remotely accused of having a conflict of interest, yet the file-concealing Home Office is trying to insist upon retaining Lady Woolf’s services as the enquiry leader. The fact that two unsuitable choices have been made in a row by the public-deceiving Home Office says loudly and clearly that a further cover-up is intended, because once one domino falls the rest are going to follow with an enormous clattering that will be heard all the way to Canada, which is not wanted by certain members of the political class.
Lord Tebbit is on record as saying that covering up sexual misconduct in office was “the done thing” while he was in the Commons. I therefore asked the Home Office, as an FOI request on 6 July this year, to provide me with the total number of arrests of ordinary people for sexual misconduct against children. The request was allocated the number 32211, which was changed subsequently to 32424 following a clarification request from one Andy Woodgate of the Information Access Team. He said the Home Office would aim to respond by 27 August 2014.
Even following an internal review that I requested when the response date was over a week past due, I am STILL awaiting the information that I asked for. In one more week’s time I will refer the matter to the Information Commissioner, because I have no trust in your Home Secretary as she is obviously not in full control of her Department.
Another reason not to trust MP’s is Iain Duncan Smith who, we learn today, has permitted the already “re-set” Universal Disaster project to once again slip into time arrears (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/oct/22/universal-credit-timetable-slips-again) The conclusion is, among many people now, that this project will not be implemented properly and fully unless or until this waste of oxygen has been removed from office and consigned once again to the back-bench obscurity whence he should never have been permitted to emerge in the first place.
Another reason not trust MP’s is you. You are on record as supporting the protestors in Hong Kong, yet you are doing nothing whatever to control what are laughingly referred to as “police constables” involved in the Occupy Democracy movement in Tarpaulin Square, right outside the front door of the Palace of Wasteminster. One protestor, allying himself with the statue of a man who was arguably the greatest Prime Minister this country ever had or will have, in order to underline his commitment to democracy, was deliberately imprisoned with a steel fence and then denied food and water by the uniformed creatures who can now be described only as State-sponsored thugs (https://www.facebook.com/keith.lindsaycameron/posts/10154830748145372 ; https://www.itv.com/news/london/2014-10-22/lone-occupy-protester-arrested-after-two-day-standoff-with-police/). In doing this, these creatures breached international law to which this nation was an early signatory, not only in the matter of basic human rights to food and water, but they imprisoned the protestor without first affording him the opportunity to face a formal trial. That is false imprisonment, Prime Minister, which is a criminal offence no matter who commits it. When can we exp[ect those responsible for this breach of clearly written UK law to be arrested, charged and convicted?
Having imprisoned the protestor (Danny) they then proceeded to deny him sustenance, going so far as to arrest those who tried to supply him out of human compassion, saying that as Danny was considered to be in solitary confinement it was an offence to offer him food or water. That, in the vernacular, Prime Minister, is the biggest load of bollocks ever to come out of a copper’s mouth, and that copper is a disgrace to the uniform that he infests and should be extracted from it at the earliest opportunity. As the protestor had been deliberately imprisoned by the police, it was their legal duty to supply him with sustenance. Their active denial of food and water to someone whom they considered to be in their custody is legally described as TORTURE, Prime Minister. Again, an offence under international, and even our own, laws. Did you or any other MP move to correct this situation? No. You are therefore guilty by association and we therefore have no reason whatsoever to trust you or your government with our ongoing welfare as a nation.
Finally, even though I could continue for hours in the same critical vein, there is the matter of the disabled community, which has been so abominably treated by your government. Iain Duncan Smith’s Department is on record as admitting that there are some 7.7 million “eligible claimants” for the Universal Disaster. ELIGIBLE CLAIMANTS, Prime Minister. E.L.I.G.I.B.L.E.
So WHY is Iain Duncan Smith’s same Department working so furiously to throw these people OFF the benefits roll with such utterly ludicrous garbage as that reported in this link? (https://www.welfareweekly.com/thousands-incurable-conditions-told-fit-work-future/)
You and your Ministers need to start looking very carefully at your behaviour towards ordinary people, because if you don’t I can see a situation occurring in the Palace of Wasteminster with remarkable similarities to that which has just occurred in the Canadian parliament.
Think on, Prime Minister.
Sincerely,
Darren Lynch
