6.7 C
Dorset
Sunday, April 19, 2026
Home Blog

Fear, grievance and hate: How a community became radicalised

This article was originally published on August 11, 2023.

Legal experts have assessed the content and are now pursuing legal action against a number of parties. The article that is the catalyst for at least two ongoing documentaries and a series of national and international articles can now return.

Weymouth & Portland is a community with a proud armed forces tradition – not least in relation to our role in defeating the Nazis in WWII.  So how is it that a section of our community has been radicalised into racism and hatred?  How is it that so many people have been persuaded to hate a group of people they’ve never met?  And how is it that people have aligned themselves with exactly the kind of Far Right ideology that their brave forebearers fought against?

Here, we try to answer those questions and, in doing so, expose how three key elements – fear, grievance and racist hatred – have been utilised.  For the first time, we will publish people’s own words – including many appalling examples of racism – and document some of the key actors in a sorry campaign of hatred.

Some Background

On 5th April, 2023, the Home Office confirmed plans to house 506 people seeking asylum (safety) in the UK on a barge, the Bibby Stockholm, at Portland Port.  The privately-owned Portland Port had agreed to a lucrative contract with the government to house the barge without undertaking any public consultation.  Because y’know….. capitalism.  Money (for the few) talks and human rights walk – as do the feelings of local people. 

The Langham family who owns the Port made 19 donations to UKIP totalling over £70,000 and have connections to this Conservative government.  Former investment banker Jill May, sister of the late John Langham, was re-appointed to the BoE’s Prudential Regulation Committee in 2021 by Rishi Sunak. She is currently listed as owning 11.68% shares in Langham Industries Ltd.  As expected, May and Langham family members own the majority of shares.  The deal to house the barge is worth a reported £2.5 Million.

The barge itself has been modified to change its capacity from 220 people to 506 plus up to 40 staff!  The refugees will share small rooms with bunk beds.  The government ordered the small TV screens to be disconnected.  Held in a secure port, the barge is, without doubt, a quasi-prison. It was even described as such by South Dorset MP Richard Drax whose family made their own fortune from the slave trade.  Drax had very little warning from his own Party about the barge – perhaps indicating the contempt they have, even for their own MPs – and his protestations have been ineffectual.

It seems everyone is against the barge!  Local MPs, Dorset and Portland Councils and Councillors, human rights groups and anti-racist groups such as Stand Up To Racism Dorset, and a campaign now known as ‘No To The Barge’.  The NTTB campaign began as a Facebook group named ‘Portland Immigration Barge Discussions (aka Barge Bitchin)’.  Later, the ‘Barge Bitchin’ was dropped and, in mid-June it was changed to ‘No To The Barge’.  It is this Facebook group (and its associated real-life campaign) that has been home to appalling levels of racism and Far Right activity. 

Fear

The initial and abiding reaction of people on the NTTB group is based upon fear and the spreading of fear.  Some of that fear is based upon a lack of experience of diversity: Portland is a small community of 13,500 people, 96.5% of whom are white.  The Muslim population is just below 1%.  It is in this environment that people on the NTTB group have spread disinformation and fear. 

Most of that scaremongering is based around the notion that people seeking asylum are all (or mostly) criminals, rapists and murderers.  The idea that those to be housed on the barge pose a particular threat to women and children is highly prevalent. “Lock your daughters up” was the early cry!  As more and more Far Right supporters from around the UK have joined the group, the comments are increasingly about how Muslims are preparing to start a ‘religious war’ and will slaughter us all.  There has been a continual avalanche of posts and comments which have whipped up the fear to frenzied levels.

Here are some examples from the NTTB group (all quotes as written):

Julie Croley (who carried a ‘Stop The Invasion’ placard at the campaign’s events and whose husband Mike Croley regularly wears a ‘White Lives Matter’ T-shirt) talks of impending “sexual harassment, attacks and rapes”, of an “Islamic invasion” and states “We’re being turned into an Islamic country”

Bert Travers: “take lots of photos/videos of any potentially dangerous looking situations (chatting young girls up, near schools, causing trouble etc etc”)

Karen Lewis: “get CCTV on your bodies”

Darren Ozzy: “I want to see a weekly migrant victim death count just like we did with covid” and asks “What are the shops going to do when the attacks, rapes and murders begin?”

Stuart Chiswelstaff Breckell: “Would you put 506 wolves in a field with 13,535 sheep and hope for a happy ending”

Portia Duvall warns of “the violent sexual assaults on women and children on the streets”

Fifi Fitzsimmons posts about “rapists” and “men that will beat a child or a woman” and adds “We are doomed”

Julie Anderton: “There will be murders, rape and pillage!” “These 500 men will require 500 young, local ladies. They will take by force.” “Local lads will start fights with them but these migrants use knives.” “They will force their lifestyle on us including their religion. They hate us! THEY HATE US!”

Michelle Varney warns of “muggings” and Michael Mccarthy talks of “rape, robbery, muggings, attacks”

Mark Paul: “How many rapes, sexual assaults and murders need to happen?”

Steve Moore: “A high percentage will be potential groomers….. paedophile migrants. Keep your kids SAFE”

Lee Calvert: “What these retards don’t understand is we have 500 men! Coming from rapey stabby countries”

Micky Biggs: “These are pouring into Europe every day thousands of them not a woman or child in sight. Mostly ex prisoners and criminal economic migrants”

Elaine Bearne (as Fanny Adams): “The illegals steal pets”

Chaz Charlton: “heard they are putting a temporary musque in the bowl up the grove”

Sandra Willis Smith declares there are “no go zones for white people happening up and down the country” and that the asylum seekers “have all tested positive for HIV”

Margit Cotton: “We’re being invaded,” “50 years from now we’ll be a Muslim country”

Micky Greeno: “This country has to stop this onslaught and invasion”

Phillip Davies declares we are being “Invaded by a Muslim army”

Chris Leggy Legg: “This is an army of fighting aged men”

Jackie Teague: “These men are gathering an army under the guise of asylum”

Sue Ayton warns we will be “killed off by these illegals”

Darren Jenkins: “For all we know they could have been chopping off heads a few months ago”

Allen Varney: “All ready for when they take over…. Only a matter of time”

Ally Carroll: “We have a religious war brewing,” “these illegals, 606,000 in UK up to last year, are part of a global organised invasion,” “certainly a move to destroy against the indigenous peoples of GB”

Colin Waller: “They are foot soldiers waiting for the call from Islam”

The fearmongering is amplified by numerous people including Adrian Mitchell, Stephen Cobb and campaign leader Alex Bailey posting a litany of screenshots of articles about non-white people committing crime, especially sexual crime.  Mitchell posts the same 6 screenshots repeatedly.  Of course, they never post any reports of white people committing the same crimes.

At one point, regular group contributors Stuart Chiswelstaff Breckell and Darren Ozzy even discuss how the recent Bournemouth beach tragedy was “almost certainly a migrant attack” and that the media and government are suppressing it!

Shockingly, Asian holidaymakers have been followed and photographed with people stating that ‘they’re here already and staying in B&B’s!’  Bert Travers, sitting at home watching a webcam positioned on Weymouth seafront, posted a photo of Asian men using the toilets! He claimed that one of them didn’t come out and that young girls went in the same cubicle!  In the comments, people asked if it was people from the barge!

He posted a screenshot of the two men, which included several children in swim wear!

Gallery 1:

Grievance

Much as it was used by the Nazis in 1930s Germany, the second crucial element of this hate campaign is the fostering of a sense of grievance and resentment – in this instance, towards the asylum seekers. 

Weymouth & Portland is suffering.  13 years of Tory austerity has hit hard.  Several wards are in the top 10% or top 20% of multiple deprivation.  Wages are low and housing and other costs are high.  Council tax is one of the highest in the country and families are suffering with the ‘cost of the one-percent’s greed’ crisis.  Public services have been slashed and NHS services withdrawn or inaccessible.  Portland Hospital has been downgraded, losing its beds, its X-ray department and then its Minor Injuries Unit.

Clearly none of that is the fault of refugees!  Those things are the result of government policy: the actions of an authoritarian right-wing government who prioritise only the wealth of their rich friends and donors – increasingly through cronyism and fraud.

This is a government who have neglected its people and, locally, the effects are stark.  So, we must ask the question: why is it that the places where the government have chosen to place large asylum detention centres are mostly white, working-class areas where people are suffering from their neglect?  Clearly, with a lot of help from their friends in the media – especially the tabloid rags – and with the Home Secretary herself claiming that this is an ‘invasion’ of people coming here ‘illegally’, this putrid government knows it can shift blame from themselves to some ‘poor brown-skinned people’.

And so it is that the NTTB group has been filled with resentment.  This resentment often takes the form of outrage ‘no matter what’.  There are numerous examples of people being up-in-arms about one thing and when that thing is shown not be true, they are equally outraged by the alternative.

“They’ll get appointments with our already stretched GPs!”  *No, GP services to the barge are being provided by a specialist surgery from Bournemouth*  “Oh right, so they get specialist GP services on tap!”

“They’ll have nothing to do and will therefore commit crime!”  *No, a range of activities will be provided through the voluntary sector*  “Oh right, they get free activities. Our children don’t get free activities!”  

“They’ll be hanging around at bus stops on Portland. They’ll be attacking our women and children there!”  *No, there will be special buses which will take them from the Port*  “Oh right, they get a free taxi service, do they?!”

“They get £20-a-day of taxpayers money!”  *No, they get £9.58 per week (around £1.37-a-day) and it comes from the Foreign Aid budget*  “Oh right, if that’s all they get, they’ll be committing lots of crime!”

“Lots of them can’t even speak English!”  *Well, for those who don’t, English lessons are available*  “Oh right, they get free lessons. You can’t make it up!”

There are many more examples of this outrage no matter what.  And there’s even denial…..

“They’ll commit loads of crime!”  *Crime statistics show that asylum seekers commit crimes at a considerably lower rate than the general population*  “That’s because the police and the government cover it up!”  And then Adrain Mitchell will post the 6 screenshots for the hundredth time!

NTTB campaigners constantly say it’s not about racism; it’s about concern over public services, like the NHS.  However, when campaigner Sammy Wallace was interviewed by the BBC, the conversation went like this:

SW: We’ve not got enough NHS, dentists, doctors: we just haven’t got it, so we’re all struggling

Reporter: If those services were improved, would it be alright?

SW: (wry smile) No…. no…. no

Reporter: So it’s about something else?

SW: It’s about the men

It cut off there, but presumably the next question was: “The area has thousands of holidaymakers descending here every summer and cruise ships regularly dock at Portland Port carrying several thousand at a time.  What is it about *these* men?

Concerns about affordable housing, low wages, disappearing local services and the state of the NHS are entirely legitimate.  Blaming refugees is not.

Racism

Members of the group are forever claiming there is no racism in the group and it’s not about racism.  They are lying and they know it.  There are literally thousands of examples of racism in the group, so I’ll merely share a small percentage and let the reader decide.

Beforehand, it’s worth noting that the default name in the NTTB group for the people seeking asylum is ‘illegals’.  That’s when they’re not being called ‘economic migrants’, ‘gimmegrants’, ‘criminals’, ‘enemy invaders’, ‘things’, ‘rapists and paedophiles’, ‘rapefugees’, ‘scum’, ‘vermin’, ‘channel rats’, ‘sub-human’ and even ‘uncivilised, sub human channel rats!’ 

But yeah, Alex Bailey and Dean Guile have declared there’s no racism here, so…..

Alex Bailey: “500 plus fighting age men of unknown origin and criminal past” (alongside a Far Right Britain First video he posted!)

Adrain Mitchell: “Illegal dust mites”

Gary Knight: “Dirty lowlife scum.  Terrorists, rapists, murderers, pedo’s the fucking lot of them. Dirty cuntz. Send the fuckers back”

Ladette M Squiggleton: “infestation”

Mark Paul: “Illegal migrants flooding into the UK”, “being over-run by alien cultures”

Paul Taylor: “every advert has a black in it or a white woman and a black man. What is going on??”

John Haliwell (in response): “I’m sick of seeing a black every time I switch on the TV. It makes my blood boil.”

(Then Dean Guile states that the ‘racism card’ is so over-used that racism doesn’t mean anything anymore!)

Michelle Varney: “They’re all fighting-aged Asian men”

Mark Paul: “Rapefugees”

Connor Spencer: “Rapists and pedophiles”

Stephen Redpath: “scrounging freeloading invaders”

Micky Greeno: “Freeloading scrounging benefit seeking chancers” (and then he called Rishi Sunak a ‘foreigner’). When Far Right activist Rod Harrison attacks Rishi Sunak, Greeno responds “He’s one of them”.

Graeme Kershaw: “vermin”

Gary C Hazel: “Ukrainians/Russians are evolved humans unlike the barge peeps”

Elaine Bearne (as Fanny Adams) calls Rishi Sunak “Dumb Pak”, “The govt being Muslim are part of whats going on”

Micky Biggs: “Economic gimmegrants”. 

Richard Mark Speed: “Scum of the earth”, “human garbage”

(Then Alex Bailey is asked by his mate Jeff Moody on GBeebies about accusations of racism and he responds: “Those words, those terminologies, are never on my mind”)

Britishoscar JJ: “500 plus males with 3rd world brains”

Roger Forbes: “this scum”

Holty Bfc: “I would rather house 500 stray dogs than them”

Jay Capaldi: posts a video of a sickeningly racist song

Mark Pickering: “Paedophiles”

Aly Carroll: “Boat illegals”, “freeloading illegal gimmegrants”

Joe Kelly: “Stealth invasion”, “invading army”, “scum” and “fucking gimmegrants”

Jon Burt: “My daughter was seeing a Nigerian and yeah I gave it the ‘Here boy go dig the garden will ya’ and so on which was having a bit of a giggle with him (now deemed really racist)”

John Burt (again): When someone posts about the company the Home Office secured the barge from having historic links to the slave trade, Burt responds “gonna be having some more ethnics on board again then, maybe they should be treated the same.”

(Then Dean Guile insists racism is not a thing any more….. again)

Alan Croley (on a post about sewerage): “Serve it to them at dinner time”

Tracie Hobden: “When are the things actually arriving”

Beverly Ann Gardiner: “I don’t want the things in this country at all”

Jack Williams: “Need to shout go home f’ing invaders”

Carla Capaldi: “Yes f@&) off back then”

Mathew Barnes: “Yup off they fuck back to the mud huts”

Tracey Bailey: “Who the hell do they think they are in our country”

Nicky Cee: “very soon it’s going to be overrun with vermin”

Terry Topper Brown (on a post about fire regulations): “Let em burn”

(Then Alex Bailey and the other campaign leaders all say ‘there’s no racism here’)

Sue Bailey (Alex’s mother): “the gov’t will go down in history as the murderers of the GB race”

Kim Elizabeth Rye: “a bunch of scrounging chancers who are not refugees”, “foreign criminals”

Cindy Lou: “these animals”

Helen Mcginlay: “That’s what they do live in the fields and make a fire kill some animals and cook them”

Stuart Chiswelstaff Breckell: “channel rats”

Carol Hobday: “They shit on pavment”, “wors than rats”, “animals”, “stink” and “eat scraps”

Daz Dolbear: “channel rats” (at least 20 times, usually with a rat cartoon/emoji), “uncivilised channel rats”, “dangerous channel rats”, “sub human channel rats” and eventually “Since when have these uncivilised subhuman channel rats been human beings”

Readers may well know the effects of such dehumanising language:

“Remember, it didn’t start with gas chambers. It started with politicians dividing the people with ‘us vs. them.’ It started with intolerance and hate speech, and when people stopped caring, became desensitized, and turned a blind eye, it became a slippery slope to genocide”.
(Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum)

The NTTB campaign leaders – including Alex Bailey, Kate Robson, Steve Coggins, Stephen Cobb and Susan Pheonix – claim it’s not about racism and protest that there’s no racism to be seen.  They know full well that their group is an absolute cesspit of racism (and increasingly, Far Right engagement), and they have, essentially, done nothing to stop it.  They are complicit!

Shame on them!  They bring shame to our island!

Gallery 2:

Threats

A consistent feature of the NTTB campaign group is the threats made in relation to the barge and its inhabitants.  Some may say that such threats are meant as ‘jokes’ but they add to the environment of hatred and animosity.

Stuart Chiswelstaff Breckell and Peter White both suggest adding a hand grenade to the refugee ‘welcome packs’ being made by locals.

Dan Boorn suggests buying “lots of plant fertiliser and reading many websites” adding “We shall fight them on the beaches, inshallah”

Andrew Long: “Wonder if that old Sherman tank at the D Day centre would start up” to which Allen Varney responds “hopefully with a couple of shells inside”

Colin Campbell: “Portland is luckily infested by divers. Most of us are ex-service. What security is in place to protect the barge. Asking for numerous friends….”

Sue Ayton declares that she’s “not worried about the barge going up in smoke with them on it”

When Mark Peters asks “Will they be allowed to get off and roam the island!!!!” Darren Ozzy replies “If they do then it is fair game”

Mark Loader suggests sinking the barge (when it’s full) and Stepehen Guest suggests towing the barge to Lulworth ranges.

Jennifer Brookes: “Anybody got a speedboat and a Molotov cocktail. On a dark night.”

Richard J Taylor: “Anybody got the Royal Navy’s phone number maybe they can sink the damn thing”

Sandra Willis Smith: “Just cut the holdings let it float out to sea if we’re lucky the winter storms will do the rest for us”

Verity Jane and Aly Carroll discuss how plans and plots should be discussed in person, rather than online where there are ‘spies’ and ‘police’.

Nicholas Hough: “Bomb the fuckers”

Daz Dolbear: “I think I will be carrying some weapons with me out and about as long as I can split a couple of their heads in two during the melly I’ll be happy”

John Jeffries (on a post about the proposed waste incinerator): “Could use the incinerator for the immigrants”

I’ll just repeat that for anyone that missed it……

“Could use the incinerator for the immigrants”

The threats haven’t stopped at the asylum seekers.  Abuse and veiled threats have been hurled at anyone who dares to challenge their racism as well as local anti-racists and Councillors. 

Darren Ozzy (real name Darren Johnston) and Micky Greeno have been particularly abusive to several local women, sometimes in public, sometimes sending vile private messages and saying they know where someone works.

Micky Greeno: “That (woman’s name) freak gets her moneys worth out of that Primark dress she wears”

Darren Ozzy (Johnston): who shared screenshots of people he states are “in favour of the barge” alongside veiled threats and sent this: “Maybe ask around, see how quiet I am when confronted, give it a try next time you see me, see how quiet I am when I actually know who the fuck you are”, “Can’t farm Facebook likes when you’ve been raped and killed” and “Are you just gagging for a bit of dark meat now no white man would touch you with a ten foot barge pole?”

Chris Leggy Legg named two Portland women in a false and antagonistic diatribe about Stand Up To Racism Dorset.

Toby Carter: “Where do you live, Traitor?”

Paul Wagstaff: “You are a traitor to your country and it’s people”

Joe Kelly: “Cunts like you need to fuck off to Middle East countries ya fucking prick”

There have been disgusting and ill-informed attacks on Councils, individual Councillors and Stand Up To Racism Dorset members – in many cases, the very people who have, over many years, campaigned to save Portland Hospital, oppose the proposed waste incinerator, prevent public service cuts and keep affordable and social housing for local people.

Anyone challenging the racism online gets instantly labelled a ‘troll’, ridiculed, abused and, very often, removed from the group by that bastion of free speech Alex Bailey!  I myself was removed by Bailey some time ago for daring to speak out.

Most worryingly, a local 15-year-old girl has recently been called the ‘n-word’ on snapchat and, on the bus, a woman looked at her and said: “bet you’re from the barge!”

Gallery 3:

No To The Barge and The Far Right

The first six weeks of the NTTB’s existence saw predominantly local people join the group, albeit that links to, and videos from, Far Right groups were sometimes posted.  The last eight weeks has seen a considerable increase in people joining from around the UK, many of whom are also in various Far Right groups.  It has also been noticeable that many of the most vocal group members have moved to the area from elsewhere in the UK, including Alex Bailey who moved to Weymouth from Dover last year.  Many of these prominent members have stated that they moved here “to get away from them” as one person put it!

In June, Hope Not Hate published their latest exposé on ‘self-proclaimed migrant hunters’: 

https://hopenothate.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Migrant-hunters-resource-final-version-updated-June-23.pdf

It’s worth noting that:

Page 2 – Patriotic Alternative – leafleted Weymouth in June.

Page 3 – Britain First – the recent threatening letters sent to businesses and Councillors were signed from Britain First.  The fascist group have denied involvement.

Page 4 – Voice of Wales – there has been loads of interaction between them and NTTB/Alex Bailey.  Stan Robinson and James Harvey (two VoW leaders) came to Portland for several days and met with, and interviewed, Bailey.  They have since conducted a second interview.  Robinson is posting on the NTTB group.

Page 5 – Alek Yerbury – Fellow Far Right activist Rod Harrison has been posting on the NTTB group for weeks and now Yerbury is posting.  Yerbury has also posted the NTTB group link on another Far Right group.  How sad that a proud military town is now giving any credence to a man who styles himself on Adolf Hitler!

Page 7 – Amanda Smith (aka ‘Yorkshire Rose’) – posted to the NTTB group recently and Alex Bailey commented underneath that he had sent her a Direct Message.

NTTB members have posted links to, and articles and videos from, at least 16 different Far Right and extremist groups.  I will not name them here.  However, by example:

Mike Croley posted David Lane’s ’14 Words’, the most popular White Supremacist slogan in the world.  He also describes Far Right Patriotic Alternative as ‘Awake, not woke!”

Aly Carroll posted links to, and content from, several Far Right groups

Chris Leggy Legg posted a video of Stephen Yaxley Lennon (aka Tommy Robinson)

Verity Jane posted several Britain First videos…. and Alex Bailey and Darren Reynolds also posted one

Joanne Barlow, Andy Long, Elaine Bearne and others posted racist Far Right videos

Julie Button posted from a Far Right group and Lisa Flann and Elaine Bearne shared posts by Alek Yerbury

NTTB Campaign admin Steve Coggins’ Facebook ‘likes’ include the Anti-Islam Alliance

Stephen Cobb states that he’s heard ‘Tommy Robinson’ is bringing a bus load of people to the NTTB protest (he didn’t) and then stated: “Shame Tommy Robinson has not got time to visit us”

Along with other new members, Far Right activist Rod Harrison is invited to the NTTB protest by Steve Coggins.  After joining the group, Harrison posts 19 times in one week – the most prolific poster.  He regularly reposts Alek Yerbury posts from Far Right groups

Janet Rosemary celebrates Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech

Gary C Hazel posts about the Far Right ‘Great Replacement Theory’, the “genocide of the British People” and calls for “Civil War”

Mike Croley, Kim Gray, Robert House, Kevin Samuel Furniss and others post about the Far Right ‘Kalergi plan’.  There are lots of Far Right conspiracy theories around ‘Great Replacement’, ‘Agenda 2030’ and secret UN/WEF plans for a ‘New World Order’ – all relating to the ‘replacement of white people’

Along with other new members, Steve Coggins welcomes Hitler-wannabe Alek Yerbury to the group.  His first comment is to attack Stand Up To Racism

Stan Robinson from Far Right Voice of Wales posts regularly to the group

Anti-migrant campaigner Katie Elizabeth Rye from Dover encourages NTTB to join forces with other anti-migrant groups online, saying: “form yourselves into a much larger and much more threatening identity”

Facebook even joins in.  Based on NTTB’s strong links with Far Right groups, it suggests to me that I ‘might like’ a Far Right group where Yerbury is an admin.  I don’t!

Worryingly, given their racism and proximity to the Far Right, the NTTB campaign has begun recruiting candidates to ‘replace those Councillors who they feel have not supported them.’  It is no coincidence that they have abused Councillors and misrepresented their words and actions to aid their electoral ambitions.  They say they are looking for people who will “help them to achieve their goals.”  I trust my fellow Portlanders will reject hate at the ballot box.

Gallery 4:

Alex Bailey

The NTTB campaign’s main leader so far has been Alex Bailey.  Whether he has aspirations to be a Far Right activist is unclear, but his willingness to be close to the Far Right is now evident.  His running of the NTTB campaign bears a very close comparison to Hope Not hate’s description of Patriotic Alternative’s modus operandi. 

He appears to be a keen liar, deliberately and constantly referring to the local Stand Up To Racism group as ‘the racism group’ and a ‘hate group’ and claiming their protesters are ‘bused in!’  When NTTB regular Simon Avery told a SUTRD protester; “When you get raped, I’ll laugh my ass off”, the comment was caught on film and went around social media to widespread condemnation.  Bailey declared that he’d ‘looked into the man and he was nothing to do with their group!’  Avery had been a member of NTTB for over a month, had posted regularly and was at their protest!  Avery left the group for two days….. and then returned.

When Bailey had a falling out with Julie Croley, she declared publicly that he ‘was Far Right’ and intends to use the campaign to gain support for when he stands as an electoral candidate.  He then kicked her out of the group and told everyone she was unable to continue due to illness.  Bailey certainly has a politician’s knack for narcissism, deceitfulness, and self-promotion.  One would hope the electorate has had enough of that!

Interestingly, it seems there is further dissent within the ranks.  NTTB candidate organiser Antony Nailer recently criticised Bailey for not attending their first meeting (because he was being interviewed by a Far Right group), for deliberately pushing his post down their page and for his ‘self-aggrandizement.’  There are growing whispers that the people of Portland are cottoning on and feel he has been using them for his own ends.  Whilst not living on Portland, he constantly says he is ‘giving us our voice.’  It remains to be seen how long we’ll believe him.

The backlog of asylum cases that has created the problem in the first place is a (conceivably deliberate) failure of government.  Poor people escaping war, persecution, imprisonment, and torture are not to blame.  The blame lies squarely with a government who care for refugees about as much as they care for our communities.

When I stated at the start that our community had been ‘radicalised’ through fear, grievance and hate, there is some truth to that.  How else would a community so proud of fighting fascism in WWII be openly greeting fascists and their dangerous ideas?  However, the fact is that it is actually just a very small section of our community.  Most people on Portland (and in Weymouth) are not racist and the community at large has been doing amazing things to welcome and support refugees.  The majority of people, including those in the NTTB Facebook group, are decent, kind, charitable and welcoming and believe that refugees are human beings who, like all of us, deserve to live in safety.

Gallery 5:

Liz Bladon

Please SUPPORT US where you can: Award Winning Independent Citizen Media Needs Your Help. PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST £2 A MONTH

Dorset Eye wins big at Independent Media Awards

Ten years after its launch, Dorset Eye has won the Independent Media Awards for Citizen Media, Regional/Local Outlet of the Year and Political Reporting of the Year. The awards which were officially announced on 26th March where some of the hundreds of independent media were recognised for their tenacity in bringing to the public’s attention many of the news… stories that the corporate media either seeks to ignore or distort.

Dorset Eye was a founding member of The Media Fund which has since morphed in to the Independent Media Association. Both were set up to create a cooperative culture within the media and to raise vital funds to help all members to grow and to be sustainable. Many have now joined the regulatory organisation IMPRESS created out of the aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry.

IMPRESS is the Independent Monitor for the Press and is an independent press regulator in the UK. It was the first to be recognised by the Press Recognition Panel. Unlike the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), IMPRESS is fully compliant with the recommendations of the Leveson Inquiry.

As a result of membership of both the IMA and IMPRESS Dorset Eye is fully compliant with the standards of media content in the UK and along with all other members is held to a higher standard than the corporate media are under the IPSO.

The recognition bestowed on Dorset Eye as a leading Citizen Media, in which the public are empowered and respected for their voice, is part of our journey to hopefully becoming normalised across the UK and beyond. Unlike the top down corporate media model that tends to propagandise and distract, citizen media is the only route to democracy in its definitive sense.

Citizen Journalism - Independent Media Association

We all experience information and we all impart our own prerequisite conditioning on to our perceptions and narrative. This must be understood as a given. For those who denigrate citizen media it is vital to remember that humans are not and never will be above subjective interpretation. Citizen media accepts that interpretation in all its complexities is the norm and does not seek to deny this. It also accepts that by publishing news and other content it is up to the reader to do their own research and that this is merely a starting gun for more knowledge and enlightenment.

We are also exceptionally proud to be recognised for our award as Regional/Local Outlet of the Year. Approximately half of all of our content comes from local people and local places and with nearly eight thousand contributors signed up to the site we consider that our first ten years has been a remarkable success.

Regional Local Outlet of the Year Award

At a time when the corporate regionals are struggling in terms of revenue and the quality of their provision the independent sector is very much on the rise. We are extremely grateful to the local people and organisations who are supporting us in ever increasing numbers. Their dedication to being part of the news media in a proactive sense is changing the landscape in a very positive way. The dramatic fall in sales of corporate newspapers reflects a culture in which many people refuse to be ignored and silenced.

Dorset Eye is also very proud of its recognition for political reporting and helping to uncover many of the clandestine elements of society that powerful figures and again the corporate media attempt to hide or obfuscate. A significant amount of our content is about political enlightenment and helping people to remove the smokescreen.

Dorset Eye also have a TV channel that celebrates its first anniversary in April in which it delves in to local, national and international issues with those in the know. Entitled ‘Ten By Six’ it explores those issues that the corporate media tend not to.

However, besides of all the positive news the main obstacle is funding. The government and the establishment generally perceive independent media as a threat to their grip on power and people’s consciousnesses and therefore financial support is very much more hard to come by than for the corporate media. With this in mind we reluctantly accepted advertising on the site but going forward we would much prefer to be a publicly funded non advertising experience. This leads us to finding ways of raising funds. We very much need to get to a thousand people who are prepared to support us by donating £2… a month. If we can get ten thousand people supporting us we can set up a news desk, training courses and many of the other exciting projects.

Finally we would like to say a Big Thank You to our readers and contributors. The effort and energy that they put in to creating content in particular helps shape what little democracy the state allows us. Without you we are nothing xx

The Dorset Eye Team

Please join us on social media:

Twitter: @dorset_eye

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheDorsetEye

Instagram: Dorset Eye

Which Financial Markets Are Least Affected By the Pandemic?

We have finally seen off 2020 — a milestone most around the world will welcome — and we’re beginning to see light at the end of the coronavirus tunnel. That doesn’t mean we’ve reached the end of this international nightmare just yet. But vaccines appear to be on the way (yes, really this time), and that’s something!

We reported on the ‘UK Government Seriously Considering a Compulsory COVID-19 Vaccination Program’ and that will certainly spark fresh debate, and unease among those who don’t trust the vaccine. But that’s a bridge we can cross when we arrive at it. The mere fact that the government has reason to consider something like this is a positive sign that citizens will be able to be vaccinated before too long — possibly in the spring of 2021.

Naturally, the best part of all this is that we may be able to safely return to something resembling ordinary life. But another positive result might just be an economic uptick. It goes without saying that the global recession we in the UK have gotten more than a little caught up in was caused by the pandemic itself. And while the easing of that pandemic won’t automatically turn around major world economies, it should help in some regards. Widespread vaccinations and ongoing precautions will lead to more ordinary life; more ordinary life will lead to greater optimism and consumer activity; and optimism and consumer activity can lift an economy out of a difficult time.

If this all plays out more or less as described, it’s also likely to bring about an uptick in investment. But the interesting question is going to be which markets people are confident putting their money in. Understandably, the market collapses we saw back in the spring of this year left many feeling skittish about conventional investment. And hopefully those sentiments ebb away when it’s appropriate for them to do so! But in the meantime, as we look ahead to that light at the end of the tunnel, it’s worthwhile to consider which investments people may favour when they do start to invest again.

It may well be that the ones people gravitate toward will be those that have actually been least negatively affected by the pandemic to begin with. Following this line of thinking, three popular investment markets stand out.

Cryptocurrency

A year ago, cryptocurrency still seemed like a little bit of a fringe market. There was plenty of value going around, and plenty of investors got wealthy trading assets like bitcoin, ethereum, and the like. But the average person looking to establish a portfolio and build wealth still looked at cryptocurrency as something undefined, uncertain, and risky.

It may still be those things, but it is also — undeniably — among the trading markets that functioned best during the worst of the pandemic. While cryptocurrency prices did fall when the market all around the world first dropped off, the major coins bounced back rapidly and then kept climbing cryptocurrency has proven that it can withstand a recession, and some of the top assets in the category are now trading near all-time highs.

Forex

Forex is almost a difficult market to assess in broad strokes, because it is comprised of major currencies from all around the world. Clearly, we’ve seen some of those currencies struggle more than others during the pandemic and recession, such that investing in one currency might not have been as productive as investing in another. In forexthough, that’s not so different from ordinary circumstances.

In FXCM’s examination of forex trading, a section on how to make money in the market points out that because of the market’s depth and liquidity, “it is possible to implement almost any viable strategy” and find success. It also points out that traders can profit by being long or short on a given asset — essentially meaning currency value gains and losses can yield profits. Given these general conditions, it’s fair to say that fundamentally, the forex market has remained relatively unchanged.

Housing

This one has been baffling some analysts (as well as casual observers) for months. But it’s a simple fact at this point that the UK’s housing market has somehow avoided any sort of meaningful struggle throughout the difficult circumstances of 2020. In fact, when The Guardian looked into the housing market just recently, it determined that house prices actually jumped at the “fastest rate in four years.”

To be clear, some still expect to see a belated effect. Additional COVID-related controls this winter could slow down the market. And if this happens and we don’t see a return to normal as soon as we’re beginning to hope for, that slowdown could persist. In other words, keep a close eye on housing, as it could conceivably suffer a sort of late-stage pandemic effect. But for now, housing has to be mentioned among the investment markets that have withstood the year’s complications.

Beyond these markets, there’s considerably more uncertainty. Commodities have been all over the place (gold thriving, oil crashing, etc.), and need to be considered individually. Stock markets have largely recovered and according to BBC are soaring in the hopes of a vaccine, but could always turn at a moment’s notice in a time like this. But cryptocurrency, forex, and housing investment look to be relatively stable alternatives.

That does not mean that putting money into these markets will automatically net returns as we crawl our way out of this pandemic. Investing always involves risk, and in a time like this any piece of news can turn a market upside down in a hurry. If things do begin to turn around though, and people gravitate toward the markets that acquitted themselves well through the worst of 2020, these are the ones that will stand out.

Which Financial Markets Are Least Affected By the Pandemic?

PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST £2 A MONTH

https://dorseteye.com/donate/

Not The News with Jolyon Rubinstein

Independent media are collaborating on a weekly series that will bring the investigative journalism so often missing from the corporate media.

Dorset Eye is part of the Bywire™ News Network @bywirenews and we are all collaborating on trying to uncover the real news as opposed to the manufactured news agenda delivered by the corporate mainstream.

As part of this ‘Not The News’ with Joylon will be a weekly investigation in to how those who hold the puppet strings intend to obfuscate and shroud us from reality.

Joylon will bring what you only rarely see on our TV’s and newspapers.

Jason Cridland

Matthew Goodwin Cannot Find His ‘AI-Generated Self-Published Book’ in Waterstones and the Comments are Hilarious

Let us start here to set the scene.

If one stands in Waterstones appealing to people who can only read short words written in big print, then is it any wonder that intelligent people will make mincemeat of you? Of course not.

Jack Dart

‘Look for the AI section; it’s probably there.’

Stewart Osborne

“Why isn’t an allegedly non-fiction paperback included in this display of fiction hardbacks?”

“Is this your first time in bookshop?” 

Joey Palmer

“Hello, I know you may think that as a reform voter I am illiterate, but actually I would very much like to read Matt Goodwin’s new AI-written book, ‘Mein Kampf for Dummies.'”

Caroline Ni Chinneide

“No thanks, I can read ChatGPT-generated slop off my own phone without spending money.”

Phill Smith

“Does someone want to tell him he’s standing by the hardback section, so he probably won’t find his paperback there?”

Paul Boland

“I’m surprised you didn’t just ask ChatGPT.”

Two Mugs, A Brew, And Some Geese

“I applaud any company that takes a stand against AI slop.” 

John John

“Try looking in the fiction section”.

Stewart Osborne

“…Remember the old adage: never interrupt your enemy when he is making himself look like a massive bellend”. 

Kevin Michael McEvoy

“1- it isn’t the number 1 paperback

2 – Waterstones don’t put books written by AI on shelves

3- You are standing in the hardback section”.

Matthew Smith

“The last time I checked, Waterstones doesn’t sell toilet paper.”

Julia Gti

“It reminds me of that JR Hartley advert.”

Richard Briant

“I’m sure they prefer books written by humans.”

James McRobert-Thompson

“I smell a pulping coming along.”

And so it continues into infinity…

Julia Hartley-Brewer is a Stooge For Fossil Fuel Companies and Her Arguments are Six Decades Out of Date

I TOLD JULIA HARTLEY BREWER THAT “YOUR ARGUMENT IS FROM THE 1960’S !

YOU WANT TO KEEP US ADDICTED TO AN OIL ECONOMY THAT THREATENS BRITAIN’S NATIONAL SECURITY!”

As director of the Climate Media Coalition, I was invited onto Talk TV’s Jullia Hartley Brewer’s show to discuss Ed Miliband’s call for a faster clean energy transition in light of the Israeli war on the Iran oil crisis.

(Please do not forget to sign our petition to get rid of billionaire media – see note/link at the end!)

Hartley Brewer hilariously claimed, “Ed Miliband is taking us back to the caves with solar and wind”.

Brewer pointed out that the Renewables UK spokesperson said the fossil fuel price crisis indicated we should drill more.

I replied, pointing out that this spokesperson was a former Shell lobbyist and the huge oil corporation Statoil/Equinor is on her board in Britain.

I said Britain is being hammered again with an oil crisis and the urgent need to wean us off the addiction to oil is the lesson of these regular Israeli oil price crises.

Brewer intervened to say the lesson rather is we should do more oil drilling.

But I pointed out that the United States (and Norway) are self-sufficient in oil, but their drivers are still being hammered at the gas station as their oil costs also soar.

It is the oil corporations that profiteer hugely, and consumers pay the punitive prices in these crises, no matter whether the oil is drilled domestically or abroad.

I then stated that the cost to the Uk economy of the last oil crisis, caused by Russia, according to the UK’s Climate Change Committee was £100 billion.

£70 billion was the cost for taxpayers subsidising fossil fuels for consumers and £30 billion was the cost to the wider economy .

The Climate Change Committee says the cost of the clean energy transition investment would be £100 billion by 2050, i.e., the cost of just one Israeli oil price crisis!

But instead of the money being squandered subsidising burning fossil fuels. The money is instead invested in renewables that give free energy for decades and free us from oil market shocks.

I gently told Brewer that her argument is from the 1960s. She wants to keep us addicted to an oil economy that threatens Britain’s national security.

This is a fuel that has hammered us every 10 years with repeated oil crises in the Middle East.

North Sea oil peaked in 1989. It is an old mature field that now produces only expensive oil and gas.

It is a national disgrace that 1.5 million rural households in Britain are still dependent on oil 50 years after the first Israeli oil crisis.

These families are being hammered again because we have not switched them to electric heating.

I finished by saying “ I do not personally worry about an oil crisis because my home electricity is free due to the solar and battery system I have invested in. For 10.5 months it is also free at night due to my battery. I want that for every household in the UK.”

We need an inflation-proof clean energy system.

And that is what Ed Miliband is advocating for. (On renewables and storage, that is, not on his mad nuclear and carbon storage Tory proposals, which are riven with inflation and technical impossibilities!!).

Please tap the YouTube Subscribe button to join our You Tube Channel and get notified when we post our next videos.

END BILLIONAIRE MEDIA!!

The billionaire media are in a frenzied propaganda campaign to stop the oil crisis accelerating the clean transition that UK consumers need to protect them from future oil shocks.

They are screaming, in effect, “Drill Monsters Drill!”

Help us end billionaire media!

Please sign and share our Parliamentary Petition to ban billionaire media:

Yes, We Can!!

Love and courage

Donnachadh x

Racists are Rushing to Judgements on Asylum Seekers that are not Backed up by Facts, Police Say

Don’t let those who spread fake news for their own ends poison the debate or our society

The rush to judgement following reports of serious crime is as predictable as it is damaging. In the wake of a police investigation in Epsom, where a woman in her 20s alleged she had been raped outside a church, a familiar and troubling pattern has emerged: speculation, rumour, and the rapid targeting of asylum seekers and immigrants as presumed culprits, despite no evidence to support such claims.

Surrey Police have been clear. After reviewing CCTV, interviewing witnesses, and conducting forensic enquiries, officers have stated that they have not found evidence to support the offence as reported. Crucially, they have also explicitly confirmed there is no evidence linking asylum seekers or immigrants to the alleged incident. Yet they say this has not stopped a wave of online misinformation or the mobilisation of protestors driven by little more than suspicion and prejudice.

What unfolded in Epsom this week is not an isolated reaction but part of a broader societal problem. In moments of uncertainty, particularly involving allegations of violent crime, there is a segment of public discourse that defaults to blaming already marginalised groups. This instinct is not rooted in fact but in bias. It reveals how quickly fear can be weaponised and how easily narratives can be shaped by those with ideological agendas rather than evidence.

The protest itself, reportedly promoted by figures linked to far-right activism, underscores how these situations are often exploited. Demonstrators gathered, roads were blocked, and tensions escalated—not in response to confirmed details, but to rumours circulating online. The absence of verified information became a vacuum filled by assumption, and that assumption disproportionately targeted migrants. This is not accountability; it is scapegoating.

Such reactions carry real consequences. They deepen divisions within communities, foster hostility, and place innocent people at risk of harassment or worse. Asylum seekers, many of whom have fled violence and persecution, are too often recast as threats based on nothing more than their status or background. When public discourse leaps ahead of facts, it undermines not only those individuals but also the integrity of justice itself.

There is also a broader danger in eroding trust in due process. Police investigations take time, particularly in complex or sensitive cases. The demand for instant answers, coupled with suspicion of official statements, creates fertile ground for misinformation. When people choose to believe speculation over verified updates, it weakens the role of evidence in public life. Justice cannot function in an environment where conclusions are drawn before facts are established.

None of this is to diminish the seriousness of the original allegation. Claims of sexual assault must always be treated with gravity and care. But seriousness also demands responsibility, responsibility in how information is shared, how communities respond, and how narratives are formed. Jumping to racially charged conclusions does nothing to support victims or aid investigations. Instead, it distorts the situation and diverts attention from the truth.

What is needed is restraint, critical thinking, and a commitment to fairness. Waiting for verified information is not weakness; it is the foundation of a just society. Condemning entire groups based on unproven claims is not vigilance; it is prejudice.

The events in Epsom should serve as a stark reminder: when fear overrides fact, the consequences extend far beyond any single incident. If we are serious about justice, we must be equally serious about rejecting the knee-jerk racism that too often accompanies it.

The Top 15 Facts that Anti-Immigration Campaigners Get Wrong:

“Most immigrants are here illegally.”
In reality, the majority of immigrants in the UK arrive through legal routes e.g. work visas, student visas, or humanitarian protections.

“Asylum seekers get luxury treatment.”
Asylum seekers typically receive very basic support, often below the standard welfare level, and are not allowed to work while their claims are processed.

“Immigrants take jobs from locals.”
Evidence generally shows immigration has little to no negative impact on overall employment. In many cases, migrants fill labour shortages.

“Immigration drives down wages.”
Any downward pressure tends to be small and limited to specific low-wage sectors, not the workforce as a whole.

“Immigrants don’t pay taxes.”
Most migrants pay income tax, VAT, and national insurance, contributing significantly to public finances.

“They come just for benefits.”
Studies consistently show that work, safety, and family are the main motivations, not welfare.

“Crime is higher among immigrants.”
There is no consistent evidence that immigrants commit more crime than native-born citizens; in some cases, rates are lower.

“The UK takes more than its fair share of refugees.”
Compared to many countries, especially those bordering conflict zones,

the UK takes a relatively modest number.

“Asylum seekers can choose any country they want.”
In practice, people often have limited choice due to routes, family ties, language, or immediate safety.

“Most asylum claims are fake.”
A significant proportion are accepted at initial decision or on appeal, showing many claims are legitimate.

“Immigrants don’t integrate.”
Over time, most migrants learn English, work, and become part of their communities.

“They strain public services without contributing.”
While population growth does increase demand, migrants also work in and support those same services—especially in healthcare and social care.

“Stopping immigration would fix housing shortages.”
Housing issues are largely driven by supply constraints and policy decisions, not immigration alone.

“Small boat arrivals are the majority of immigrants.”
They make up a small fraction compared to those entering through legal visa routes.

“Immigration is uniquely out of control.”
Migration levels rise and fall over time and are influenced by policy choices, global events, and economic needs—not simply a lack of control.

Victim Praised Following Prison Sentence for Poole Rapist

Detectives have praised the bravery of the victim of a sexual attack after she helped bring her attacker to justice.

The victim, aged in her late teens at the time of the incident, met her attacker Alfie Wise – aged 22 and of Poole – through mutual friends while on a night out in Bournemouth on Saturday 27 August 2024.

They went back to an address in Poole with others the next morning, where the defendant sexually assaulted and raped her.

The violent nature of the attack left her with fractured thyroid cartilage in her neck.

The victim reported the matter to police later that day and she was supported through The Shores Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC) and subsequently through an Independent Sexual Violence Advisor (ISVA).

Detectives launched an investigation into the matter and the defendant was arrested and later charged.

He was found guilty following a trial at Bournemouth Crown Court of rape, sexual assault and assault by penetration. He had previously pleaded guilty to a charge of intentional strangulation.

Wise, a British national who defines himself as being of white British nationality, returned to court to be sentenced on Friday 17 April 2026, where he received a jail term of six years and nine months.

Detective Constable Tasha Beaufils, of BCP CID, said: “We have carried out a detailed investigation to compile evidence and build a case against Alfie Wise.

“However, it was the courage of the victim in coming forward and giving evidence at court, that helped to ensure we were able to secure a conviction so he could be held to account for his despicable offending.

“I hope the bravery she has shown will help give strength to other victims to come forward, in the knowledge that we will continue to do all we can to ensure they are fully supported and perpetrators are brought to justice.”

If you have been a victim of rape or sexual assault, and you want to report directly to the police, please call 101 and ask to be put in contact with a specially trained police officer. Always dial 999 in an emergency. Alternatively, you can contact The Shores Sexual Assault Referral Centre on 0800 970 9954.

Community Craft Event Launches at Nothe Fort to Support The Longest Yarn 2 Exhibition in July 2026

Nothe Fort is inviting the local community to pick up their needles and get creative with the launch of Woolly Wednesdays, a free weekly craft drop‑in running from Wednesday 22 April to Wednesday 24 June 2026, 10am–12pm.

The friendly, inclusive sessions invite knitters, crocheters, and textile enthusiasts of all abilities to help create colourful wool bunting for The Longest Yarn 2: Britain at War, a large‑scale textile art exhibition coming to Nothe Fort 1 – 31 July 2026.

Woolly Wednesdays offer participants the chance to craft, connect, and contribute to a nationally recognised community art project – all within the historic surroundings of Nothe Fort. Hot drinks and refreshments will be provided, and no booking is required.

Participants are encouraged to create triangular bunting pieces approximately 8 inches (20cm) long and 7 inches (18cm) on the widest top edge. Materials are provided, but participants are welcome to bring their own supplies.

Local knitting group KnitWits have kindly agreed to assemble all completed bunting for display and has provided example pieces.

Finished pieces can be donated during Woolly Wednesday sessions or posted directly to Nothe Fort. Details of the theme and bunting patterns can be found on the Nothe Fort website.

Can’t attend? Don’t worry! You can knit away at home and drop off bunting at Nothe Fort anytime between 10am and 3.30pm. Weymouth Library and Weymouth Pavillion have also agreed to accept bunting donations if you can’t make it to the Fort.

The bunting created during the sessions will form part of the decorations for The Longest Yarn 2: Britain at War. This popular exhibition follows the success of the original 80‑metre installation depicting the D‑Day landings. This second installation continues the project with powerful stories of wartime Britain through hand‑crafted textile art. Admission to the exhibition is included in Fort entry and Annual Passes.

Events Coordinator for the Fort Connie Jenkins-Teague, says:

“We’ve been blown away by the level of generosity and warmth shown by the local community towards this exhibition. We’re so grateful for all the time and materials donated towards making bunting and stewarding. The Longest Yarn is incredibly popular, so if you’d like to get involved in something truly special, come along to Woolly Wednesdays, or consider becoming a steward!”

Want to get involved?

Nothe Fort is also recruiting Woolly Stewards to support visitors during The Longest Yarn 2 exhibition in July.

The role includes welcoming visitors, supporting the exhibition space, and helping ensure a smooth experience. No experience is needed – full training will be provided.

Apply via the Volunteer page on the Nothe Fort website.

Craft Event details

  • What: Woolly Wednesdays – FREE Craft Drop‑In
  • When: Wednesdays, 22 April – 24 June 2026, 10am–12pm (see website for dates)
  • Where: Nothe Fort, Barrack Road, Weymouth, DT4 8UF
  • Who: Open to all ages and abilities; no booking required, materials will be provided but you are welcome to bring your own
  • Cost: Free (limited spaces)
  • Bunting drop-off locations: Nothe Fort, Weymouth Library, Weymouth Pavilion

For more information, visit:
👉 https://nothefort.org.uk/events/woolly-wednesdays/

Remembering Andy Kershaw

Today we remember and honour Andy Kershaw, a man whose voice carried far beyond the airwaves, whose passion for music knew no borders, and whose curiosity about the world enriched countless lives. His passing at the age of 66 marks the end of a remarkable chapter in British broadcasting, but his influence will continue to resonate for generations. I met Andy in Dorchester in 2011, when he was touring his book ‘No Off Switch’. He was funny, intelligent and cared deeply about music, especially world music. He, like many, had his issues, but he will be deeply missed by all that knew him.

Andy Kershaw was never just a DJ. He was an explorer, not of landscapes alone, but of sound, culture and human experience. At a time when radio playlists could feel predictable and constrained, he tore down those boundaries with fearless enthusiasm. He introduced listeners to music they didn’t yet know they needed, from the rhythms of Africa to the soul of Eastern Europe, from folk traditions to raw, unfiltered voices rarely heard on mainstream stations. He didn’t just play records; he told stories, giving context, meaning, and dignity to the music he shared.

Many first encountered him through his work with BBC Radio, where his programmes became a lifeline for those seeking something different, something authentic. His shows were unpredictable in the best possible way, guided not by trends or commercial pressures, but by instinct and integrity. You never quite knew what was coming next, but you knew it would matter.

Beyond the studio, Kershaw lived the same restless, searching life that defined his broadcasting. He travelled extensively, often to places others overlooked or avoided, driven by a genuine desire to understand people and cultures on their own terms. His work as a foreign correspondent brought depth and humanity to stories that might otherwise have gone unheard. He reported not from a distance but from within, with empathy, courage, and an unflinching commitment to truth.

His autobiography, No Off Switch, offers perhaps the clearest window into the man behind the microphone. It is a candid, often unflinching account of a life lived at full volume, from his early days in radio and his close association with figures like Billy Bragg to his globe-spanning journeys in search of music and meaning. The book does not shy away from the darker chapters: his struggles with mental health, the personal turmoil that led to legal troubles and imprisonment and the periods when his career seemed to slip away from him. Yet it is not a story of defeat. Rather, it is one of resilience, of a man who, despite everything, never lost his deep love for music or his belief in its power to connect people. “No Off Switch” captures both the brilliance and the chaos of Kershaw’s life, revealing a personality that was as complex as it was compelling.

He was also, importantly, human in the fullest sense, a man who faced challenges, who stumbled, and who endured difficult periods but who continued to return to what he loved: music, storytelling, and connection. That honesty made him not just respected but also relatable. His journey was not polished or perfect, but it was real and that authenticity is perhaps what made him so deeply valued by those who followed his work.

Andy Kershaw’s legacy is not measured in awards or accolades, though he had his share. It lives in the artists he championed long before they were recognised, in the listeners whose horizons he expanded and in the broadcasters he inspired to take risks and trust their instincts. He reminded us that music is more than entertainment; it is identity, history, resistance, and joy.

In an age increasingly shaped by algorithms and uniformity, his voice stood for something vital: the importance of curiosity, individuality, and the courage to be different. He didn’t just fill airtime; he filled minds, opening doors to worlds many would never otherwise have encountered.

As we say goodbye, we do so with gratitude. Gratitude for the sounds he shared, the stories he told and the spirit he embodied. The silence he leaves behind is profound, but it is not empty; it is filled with echoes of everything he gave us.

Rest well, Andy. Your journey may have ended, but your music and your message will play on.

19 Year Old ‘Stabbed’ in Weymouth

A 19-year-old man has been taken to hospital following a violent altercation near the junction of Dorchester Road and Melcombe Avenue in what police believe to be a stabbing incident.

Emergency services were called at 9.16pm on Thursday 16 April 2026 after reports that a had been assaulted in the area. Upon arrival, officers found the victim suffering from what has been described as a suspected stab wound. He was quickly transported to hospital for treatment. Authorities have since confirmed that, while the injuries required medical attention, they are not believed to be life-changing or life-threatening.

Dorset Police have launched a full investigation, with detectives from Dorset County CID leading enquiries. A cordon remains in place around the scene to allow forensic teams to carry out a detailed examination, as officers work to establish the precise circumstances surrounding the incident.

Dorset police have confirmed the sequence of events, noting that the report was received late in the evening and that officers responded promptly. They reiterated that no arrests have yet been made, and enquiries are ongoing to identify those responsible.

The incident has prompted an increased police presence in the surrounding area, with officers conducting patrols and engaging with local residents. Police have urged anyone who may have witnessed the altercation or who has relevant information to come forward, stressing that even minor details could prove crucial to the investigation.

For many in the community, the incident has raised concerns about safety in what is typically considered a relatively quiet part of Weymouth. While police have sought to reassure the public that this appears to be an isolated incident, the visible cordon and heightened activity have underscored the seriousness with which the matter is being treated.

Officers have emphasised that they remain committed to ensuring public safety and bringing those responsible to justice. As enquiries continue, residents are being encouraged to remain vigilant but calm, and to report any suspicious activity.

Anyone with information is asked to contact Dorset Police, either directly or anonymously through appropriate channels, as investigators work to piece together exactly what happened on Thursday night.

Antibiotics and MenB Vaccination to be Offered to Young People in Areas of Dorset Following 3 Cases of Invasive Meningococcal Disease

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) is working with Dorset Council, the NHS and local partners following three confirmed cases of meningococcal infection (meningitis) in young people in Weymouth, Dorset.

The cases were confirmed between 20 March and 15 April. All have received treatment and are recovering well. Close contacts of the cases have already been offered antibiotics as a precaution.

Two of the cases attend Budmouth Academy, and the other attends Wey Valley Academy. Further information about the signs and symptoms of meningitis has been shared with students and parents of both schools.

Around 300 to 400 cases of meningococcal disease are diagnosed in England every year. These three cases have been confirmed as Meningitis B (MenB) and are the same sub-strain type but a different sub-strain from the one detected recently in Kent.

The two cases who attend Budmouth Academy are contacts of each other, but currently no confirmed epidemiological link has been made between these cases and the third individual who attends Wey Valley. This may mean that this strain of MenB bacteria is transmitting more widely among young people in Weymouth.

Due to this, and as an additional precautionary measure, antibiotics and MenB vaccination will now be offered to young people currently in school years 7 to 13 across the Weymouth, Portland and Chickerell areas of Dorset.

Dr Beth Smout, UKHSA Deputy Director said:

“We are working closely with partners to follow up and offer precautionary antibiotics to close contacts of the cases. However, meningococcal disease does not spread easily, and outbreaks like we have seen recently in Kent are rare. These cases are not linked to the Kent outbreak, and it is important to be aware that this outbreak is not on the same scale as we saw in Kent in terms of speed of transmission or severity.

“However, it is possible that we will see further cases linked to these latest cases in Weymouth and we understand that there will be concern among students, staff, parents and the local community as we widen our offer of antibiotics and vaccination. I’d like to stress that this is an additional precaution and that we’re following national guidelines to reduce the risk of the infection spreading. School pupils and staff should attend school as normal if they remain well.”

UKHSA is now recommending a single dose of antibiotics and a meningitis B vaccine be offered to young people who live or go to school in the Weymouth area, as follows:

  • Anyone who is a resident in Weymouth or Portland or Chickerell and is in current school years 7 to 13 (or equivalent), or anyone not in full time education who would be in one of these year groups

 OR

  • Anyone who attends an educational setting in the Weymouth, Portland or Chickerell area and is in current school years 7 to 13 (or equivalent).

This will be offered in stages starting with Budmouth Academy and Wey Valley schools, as the cases attend these settings. Pupils that attend other schools and other eligible children in Weymouth who do not attend school will be invited after the weekend.

Young people under 16 should be accompanied by a parent or guardian who is able to provide consent at the time.

More information on the vaccination schedule will be provided in due course.

Dr Smout added: “Meningococcal disease can progress rapidly, so it’s essential that everyone is alert to the signs and symptoms of meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia, which can include a fever, headache, rapid breathing, drowsiness, shivering, vomiting and cold hands and feet. Septicaemia can also cause a characteristic rash that does not fade when pressed against a glass. If the disease is suspected, you should seek immediate medical attention as the disease can progress rapidly.

“It’s also important for teenagers to ensure they take up the MenACWY vaccine routinely offered by the NHS – but also to be aware that this vaccine does not protect against Men B, which is why knowing the symptoms and seeking early treatment is so important.

“Young people in school years 7 to 13 in Weymouth are strongly encouraged to take up the offer of antibiotics and MenB vaccination and we are grateful to all those involved in our investigations so far for assisting us.”

UKHSA and Dorset Council have issued advice to staff, parents and carers at all educational settings in the area.

Anyone who becomes unwell with symptoms of meningitis and septicaemia should seek medical help urgently at the closest Accident and Emergency Department or by dialling 999. Early treatment can be lifesaving. If you’re not sure if your symptoms are serious, use NHS 111 online or call 111 for further advice.

Dorset Couple Who Sold Drugs From Their Home Jailed

A man and woman from Dorset have appeared in court and been sentenced for drugs and money laundering offences following an investigation led by the South West Regional Organised Crime Unit (SWROCU). 

SWROCU officers executed a warrant at the home of Grant Putman, 33, and Brooke Marshall, 35, in Old Manor Close in Wimborne back in August 2025.   

What they found when they entered the address were quantities of white powder scattered across the kitchen worktop, a bucket containing a kilo block of cocaine and bags of cannabis, hundreds of illegal vapes in boxes on the floor and on the shelves, and THC products and cannabis resin in the fridge. Paraphernalia associated with the preparation of drugs and equipment used for the packaging and posting of products were also prominent. In the open safe in the pantry more drugs were found in a plastic confectionary tub along with thousands of pounds of bundled cash. 

In total, officers seized one-and-a-half kilos of cocaine, 400 grams of heroin, 500 grams of ketamine, two kilos of cannabis, approximately £20,000 in cash and a knuckleduster. 

Both Putman and Marshall pleaded guilty to being concerned in the supply of cocaine, ketamine and cannabis. In addition, Putman pleaded guilty to possession with intent to supply heroin and possession of an offensive weapon in a private place and Marshall pleaded guilty to money laundering. 

On Thursday 16 April 2026 at Bournemouth Crown Court, Putman was handed six years and six months in prison and Marshall was given three years and eight months. 

DS Stuart Cumine of SWROCU said: “With the support of our colleagues in Dorset Police we were able to act upon intelligence that drugs were being supplied from this residential address in the market town of Wimborne.  

“The pair were making significant sums of money operating from their family home distributing drugs and THC products in the community and to customers across the UK through the postal service.  

“The strength of the evidence was such that both Putman and Marshall pleaded guilty to the offences and the supply of these harmful drugs, which cause undeniable harm to communities, has been disrupted.” 

Members of the public are encouraged to report any information about drug dealing in their area by contacting their local police force, calling 101 or contacting Crimestoppers anonymously online or by calling 0800 555 111. 

For Those Blaming Starmer Over the Mandelson Affair You are Looking in the Wrong Place

The appointment of Peter Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador to the United States was presented as a calculated act of diplomatic pragmatism. In reality, it has come to symbolise something far more troubling: the extent to which British political decisions appear shaped—subtly, structurally, and at times disturbingly—by foreign power centres, particularly the gravitational pull of Washington and the persistent, often opaque, influence networks aligned with Israel.

To understand the significance of Mandelson’s elevation, one must first look at the political climate in which Keir Starmer made his choice. Britain was not merely appointing an ambassador; it was positioning itself in anticipation of a renewed and volatile relationship with a possible second presidency of Donald Trump. That reality alone reshaped the criteria. Gone was the idea of a conventional diplomat. In its place stood a political operator with deep transatlantic connections, a man whose value lay less in neutrality and more in his ability to navigate power, influence, and access within the American elite.

This is where the first layer of foreign influence becomes unmistakable. The United States does not formally appoint British ambassadors, but it retains an unspoken veto. Any nominee must be acceptable to the administration in Washington. The memory of Sir Kim Darroch’s forced resignation after angering Trump still loomed large, acting as a warning shot to any government tempted to assert full independence in its diplomatic choices. In that context, Mandelson was not simply selected; he was pre-approved by a political environment shaped by Trumpism. His past criticisms of Trump softened, recalibrated to meet the demands of access and survival. This was not coincidence; it was adaptation to power.

Yet the American dimension is only part of the story. Running parallel is the quieter, more difficult-to-quantify question of Israeli influence within British political life. There is no single document, no explicit directive linking Israel to Mandelson’s appointment. But to stop there would be to ignore a wider ecosystem of lobbying, advocacy, and strategic alignment that has long operated within Westminster. Former diplomats and investigative reporting have pointed to sustained efforts by pro-Israel networks to shape discourse, policy, and personnel decisions in Britain. These efforts are rarely crude or direct; they function instead through relationships, funding channels and the cultivation of political figures seen as sympathetic or strategically useful.

Mandelson, a figure deeply embedded in global elite networks and a renowned Zionist, fits comfortably within that world. His long-standing connections across business, politics, and international influence circles made him a safe pair of hands not only for managing Washington but also for operating within a broader geopolitical framework in which alignment with US and Israeli interests is often assumed rather than debated. That assumption, rarely acknowledged openly, is itself a form of influence. It narrows the field of acceptable choices before decisions are even made.

What makes this episode particularly corrosive is not merely that foreign considerations shaped the appointment, but that they appear to have outweighed serious domestic concerns. Chief among these were Mandelson’s documented associations with Jeffrey Epstein, a relationship that continued after Epstein’s conviction. Keir Starmer was not in the dark about these links. They were known, raised, and subjected to scrutiny during the vetting process. And yet Mandelson was appointed regardless.

Here, the defence offered by Downing Street begins to fray. It has been suggested that failures in the vetting process occurred below the level of ministerial oversight, that decisions were made or overridden without full political awareness. That explanation strains credibility. Even if taken at face value, it reveals a government either unwilling or unable to maintain control over one of its most sensitive appointments. If rejected, it leaves a more damaging conclusion: that the risks were understood and consciously set aside.

Either way, transparency was the first casualty. Public assurances that due process had been followed have since been undermined by revelations that Mandelson initially failed security vetting, only for that decision to be overturned. The question is no longer simply why he was appointed, but why the truth about that appointment was obscured. In a democratic system, the appearance of concealment is often as damaging as the act itself.

The deeper issue, however, lies in what this episode reveals about the balance of power. Britain likes to imagine itself as an autonomous actor on the world stage, making sovereign decisions in its own national interest. The Mandelson affair suggests something more constrained. Faced with the realities of American political dominance and the embedded influence of aligned international networks, British governments appear increasingly inclined to select figures who will not disrupt those relationships, even when doing so carries significant reputational and ethical risks at home.

This is not the crude caricature of foreign control sometimes invoked in political rhetoric. It is more subtle and, arguably, more pervasive. Influence operates through anticipation, through the internalisation of external expectations, and through the quiet understanding of what is acceptable to allies and what is not. By the time a decision like Mandelson’s appointment is made, the boundaries have already been drawn.

The result is a form of political self-limitation. Choices are framed not by what is best or safest for the country, but by what will be tolerated or welcomed by powerful partners abroad. In that context, Mandelson’s appointment begins to look less like an isolated misjudgment and more like the logical outcome of a system that prioritises alignment over accountability.

When the scandal finally broke, when the Epstein connections, the vetting failures and the internal warnings came into full view, the damage was swift and severe. Mandelson’s position became untenable, and the government was forced into apology and retreat. But by then, the deeper questions had already been exposed. Who really shapes British decision-making at the highest levels? How much weight is given to foreign approval? And at what point does pragmatism become compromise?

These are not abstract concerns. They go to the heart of democratic accountability. If key appointments can be influenced, directly or indirectly, by external powers and if known risks can be downplayed or concealed in service of those relationships, then the issue is not merely one of political error. It is one of systemic vulnerability.

In the end, the Mandelson affair is not just about one man or one appointment. It is about a political culture that appears increasingly comfortable operating within constraints set beyond its own borders and a leadership that has struggled to be fully honest about the consequences of that reality.