The UK is not an Independent State; it is a Colony

Before we get onto Izzy Lenga let’s set the scene.

Something very contemporary.

Now let’s not mince our words.

Israel, Israel, Israel. Wherever we look, their blood-soaked hands are before us. In Gaza, Syria, Lebanon, the USA, Europe and of course good old Blighty. Murder, mayhem, destruction, mutilation, corruption, and propaganda are all dumped wherever they lay their hats. The poisonous ideology of Zionism has been impacting the world like a dose of botulism for well over a century. There are things we know and things we don’t know for sure.

From collaborating with the Nazis in the lead up to World War 2

The primary example of contact between Zionist organisations and the Nazi regime in the 1930s was the Haavara Agreement (Transfer Agreement) of 1933, a controversial pact designed to facilitate the emigration of German Jews to Palestine and salvage some of their assets. Signed in August 1933 between the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank and Nazi authorities, it enabled about 60,000 Jews to move to British Mandatory Palestine between 1933 and 1939, saving their lives but prompting widespread criticism from other Jewish leaders, such as Revisionist Zionist leader Ze’ev Jabotinsky. 

• Purpose: The agreement was driven by a shared, albeit for different reasons, goal: the Nazis wanted Germany to be free of Jews (judenrein), and Zionists wanted to increase Jewish immigration to Palestine in an attempt to outnumber Palestinians.
• Mechanism: Jews leaving Germany could sell their assets and use the funds to purchase German-manufactured goods, which were then shipped to Palestine. The proceeds from selling these goods were then given to the emigrants upon their arrival in Palestine.
• Opposition: Many, including some within the Zionist movement, argued that this deal broke the international boycott of Nazi Germany, which was initiated in 1933 to fight against the Nazi regime’s discriminatory policies.

The use of the Holocaust as a mechanism for imperialism

Critics often argue that the memory of the Holocaust is strategically employed to justify state actions and silence dissent.

• Justification for State Actions: Some scholars, like Tony Greenstein, argue that the Holocaust has become the “primary justification” for the State of Israel, used to counter criticisms of its human rights record.
• Silencing Criticism: Dr. Norman Finkelstein in his book The Holocaust Industry suggests that organisations use the memory of Jewish suffering for political and financial gain, specifically to deflect criticism of Israeli policy toward Palestinians.
• Exceptionalism vs. Universal Lessons: Critics argue that institutions like Yad Vashem promote a “Zionist narrative” that emphasises Jewish strength rather than universal lessons about racism or refugee rights.
• Imperialist Framing: From a Marxist or anti-imperialist lens, Counterfire and MR Online suggest Israel serves as an outpost for Western (particularly U.S.) interests in the ‘Middle East’, with the Holocaust providing a moral shield for this role. 

Helping to create terrorist organisations in the regions of North Africa and Asia to create a permanent conflict that requires continuous death and agencies of oppression to manage it

In the 1970s and 1980s, Israel adopted a “divide-and-rule” policy, supporting Palestinian Islamist groups like the early precursors to Hamas to counter the rising secular power of Yasser Arafat’s Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). While Israel did not directly create Hamas, it indirectly fostered its rise as a counterweight to nationalist movements. 

• Initial Support for Islamists: Israeli authorities in Gaza allowed and supported Islamic movements and institutions, including the group that would become Hamas, to create a religious alternative to the PLO, which was perceived as the primary threat, often viewing these religious factions as safer, charitable, and less likely to attack.
• The Transition to Terror: By 1987, at the start of the first intifada, Hamas officially emerged from these Islamist roots. The organisation eventually turned into a “monster,” as described by former Israeli religious affairs official Avner Cohen, shifting from providing social services to armed attacks against Israel.
• “Divide and Rule” Strategy: This approach continued long-term, with some critics arguing it was later leveraged by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to maintain a divide between Hamas in Gaza and Fatah in the West Bank, thereby avoiding a unified Palestinian state.
• Blowback and Conflict: Following its growth, Hamas was heavily financed by Iran and Qatar, turning into a significant military threat, resulting in multiple armed conflicts with Israel after 2007.

Genocidal behaviour

Claims of genocidal behaviour by Israel in Gaza during the ongoing conflict are supported by various experts, human rights organisations, and a UN commission of inquiry, which point to evidence of genocidal intent and acts targeting Palestinians. 

• Evidence of Intent: Observers and researchers cite statements from Israeli officials, including Defense Minister Yoav Gallant’s reference to “human animals” and orders for a complete siege (cutting off food, fuel, and electricity), as indicators of intent.
• Actions Cited: Reports point to the scale and systematic nature of actions that exceed military objectives, such as widespread destruction, targeting of civilians (including children), and the creation of conditions designed to destroy the population.
• Documentation: Both Amnesty International and a United Nations commission of inquiry have documented patterns of conduct that they conclude indicate genocidal intent. 

Collaborating with far-right politicians and ideologues to disrupt the world and its resources

Key aspects of these interactions include:

• Ideological Alignment: Some partnerships are based on a shared “clash of civilizations” narrative, framing national struggles against common perceived threats.
• European Partnerships: Israeli right-wing figures have engaged with European parties such as Italy’s Lega, France’s National Rally, and others, often aiming to shift European Union policies to be more favourable toward Israel.
• Support for Settlement Policy: Certain far-right politicians in Europe and the U.S. express strong support for the Israeli settler movement, creating a natural affinity with Israel’s own right-wing, and sometimes far-right, coalition members.
• Controversies: Critics, including many liberal and progressive Jewish groups both in Israel and abroad, argue that these alliances can sometimes align with, or fail to adequately confront, antisemitic elements within some of these far-right movements, prioritising geopolitical alignment over concerns about extremism.

Enabling of malignant paedophilia and paedophiles

• 2025 Undercover Sting (Tel Aviv): In February 2025, the Tel Aviv District Police arrested 28 suspects following a two-month undercover investigation. Officers posed as 13-year-old girls on platforms like Instagram and WhatsApp to identify and detain individuals soliciting sexual content.
• Las Vegas Sting Operation (2025): A senior official from the Israel National Cyber Directorate, Tom Artiom Alexandrovich, was arrested in Las Vegas in August 2025 during a multi-agency sting operation. He was charged with luring a minor using technology but was released on bail and returned to Israel, sparking international debate over extradition and legal oversight.
• The Nahlaot Case (2012): One of the largest cases in Israel’s history occurred in Jerusalem’s Nahlaot neighbourhood, where at least 10 individuals were suspected of abusing over 100 children over several years. The case came to light after community members broke their silence on the systematic nature of the abuse.
• Undercover Web Investigations: In 2012, Israeli police conducted their first and largest undercover investigation of its kind, arresting over 30 suspects involved in an online ring after an officer posed as a young girl to gather evidence. 
• Fugitive Haven Concerns: Human rights activists and victims’ advocates have raised concerns that accused pedophiles from abroad exploit the Law of Return to seek refuge in Israel. High-profile cases, such as that of Malka Leifer, who fought extradition to Australia for six years before being sent back to face 74 counts of sexual abuse, have highlighted the legal hurdles in these processes.
• Jeffrey Epstein

It’s all documented if one wants to risk looking.

And knowing all of this and that Israel’s influence has already been exposed as being at play in preventing Jeremy Corbyn from becoming prime minister and enabling the chaotic Boris Johnson to set the country back decades, Labour are at it again. Corbyn’s long-standing support for Palestinian statehood and criticism of Israeli government policy placed him at odds with powerful lobbying networks and diplomatic interests. Reporting, including The Lobby, documented attempts by pro-Israel actors to influence political discourse in the UK throughout the time Corbyn was Labour leader.

And now… Izzy Lenga.

You shouldn’t be anywhere near our government if you have served in a foreign military committing genocide. https://t.co/f5tqHbxRCW

— LB (@BoozerArab) April 21, 2026

The Labour government is so up to its neck in Zionist control it now appears they can do nothing to stem it. The same also goes for the Conservatives and Reform UK. To get power they must support Zionism. The UK is not an independent country. It is a colony.